Suit filed in case of "Girl dead, boy injured at Glacier National Park

[Capt Jim Wyatt]

well, if Jim and anyone else who wants to participate in a multi-person thread all agree to publish the final results, I'd be happy to post a new thread. Just not here though.

I am game for beginning a new thread about this. Hopefully everyone can keep emotions out of a "fact based" thread.

 

[Rollin Bonz]

That was an interesting read...nowhere near relevant but still...

View attachment 683718

Quite the rabbit hole, eh?

 

[letterboy]

I am game for beginning a new thread about this. Hopefully everyone can keep emotions out of a "fact based" thread.

I see you must be new to scuba board.

Let me welcome you.

 

[KevinNM]

When a training agency decides it is more important than its instructor members or, worse, the training agency helps the plaintiff sue its own members

Well, if the members clearly violated standards and injured of killed third parties I don’t have any issue with the agency helping the injured 3rd parties gain recompense.

Last I checked, you and PADI don’t swear blood oaths to never talk to the cops and protect each other no matter what.

 

[wetb4igetinthewater]

Well, if the members clearly violated standards and injured of killed third parties I don’t have any issue with the agency helping the injured 3rd parties gain recompense.

Last I checked, you and PADI don’t swear blood oaths to never talk to the cops and protect each other no matter what.

I guess you missed the part about confidentiality.

 

[0utrageousfun]

Logged on tonight for some casual scuba reading...here I am 81 pages later. Will be curious to see how this plays out!

 

[chillyinCanada]

That's the one thing that's frustrating about ScubaBoard. Any fact based criticism elicits accusations of agency bashing by self-appointed agency defenders.

Agency bashing isn't allowed on Scubaboard in any way, shape or form, for any reason. Deal with it.

 

[wetb4igetinthewater]

Agency bashing isn't allowed on Scubaboard in anyway, shape or form, for any reason. Deal with it.

Agreed. Fact based criticism isn't agency bashing. I'm dealing just fine. Never have had any comments of such moderated so I'm good.

 

[StefinSB]

I do not and have not seen it that way.

"Fact" based criticism as you describe it is usually, if not almost always, opinion based.

And voicing an opinion as you so eloquently put it, should not automatically qualify for agency bashing.

 

[Capt Jim Wyatt]

And voicing an opinion as you so eloquently put it, should not automatically qualify for agency bashing.

Agreed. But if the opinion given is along the lines of "I think agency X sucks" Then it is agency bashing IMO.