- Messages
- 22,171
- Reaction score
- 2,798
- # of dives
- 5000 - ∞
I'd be glad to be of any assistance that I might.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
So who pays for the card? Things in this world cost $. The speciality courses are cheap enough.If someone thinks the fee for a course/gear/dive trip is too high don't take the course/don't buy the gear/don't take the trip.Just keep on diving with rented gear at the quarry/lake or where ever you can afford to dive.
I'd be glad to be of any assistance that I might.
It would raise the cost ..add 2 sessions ,lets call it $140. more..add additional weekend of dives , another $239.(includes rentals ) so now an ow course costs $885.+ crewpak ...finish paying access to quarry and accessories we are back up to almost $1,000. for ow certification.People who wish to look at pretty fish on vacation would not go for it.Let those with a more serious interest to dive take con-ed courses to better themselves if they feel they need/want it for the type of diving they wish to participate in.So what you are saying is teach the course and NOT certify the person..no card,just the training..Ok I have no problem with that,saves me the effort of getting the student a card..So the person saves a big $20. after spending $200.-$300. on a course.Sorta like graduating from a school and refusing the diploma.I guess you missed what I was trying to say, sorry if it was confusing. A Night Diver card has no value. The Night Diver course may have a lot of value, but the card itself does nothing, it gets nothing, it is worth nothing, but it costs an extra $20 or whatever the PIC fees are to get it. Not to mention having a PP photo and all that. This BTW is money the instructor does not ever get, it goes straight to the agency, who already made money selling the materials. I could list all the courses that cost extra to process for PIC fees for cards that mean nothing, and these fees are not optional BTW, but either you get what I am saying or you don't.
Who teaches students to be overweighted? I don't..Every certified diver I get for a refresher leaves my session using much less lead than when they started.As for the OW course having to cost so uch more money, how much longer would it take to teach students how to do their skills while nuetral instead while being overweighted and pinned to the bottom? Thats PPB right there, how long did it take?
If standards are followed the student knows how to and demonstrates neutral buoyancy.They also demonstrate that they can CONTROL their buoyancy(neutral/negative/postitive) for the situation.
I am not talking about running the current courses concurrently, I am talking about teaching the so called "advanced" skills at the basic level. Would it raise the cost of the course? Yeah, it would, but by extending the course an extra 1 or two sessions and adding an aditional weekend of check dives, that does not compute to doubling the cost of the course.
It would raise the cost ..add 2 sessions ,lets call it $140. more..add additional weekend of dives , another $239.(includes rentals ) so now an ow course costs $885.+ crewpak ...finish paying access to quarry and accessories we are back up to almost $1,000. for ow certification.People who wish to look at pretty fish on vacation would not go for it.Let those with a more serious interest to dive take con-ed courses to better themselves if they feel they need/want it for the type of diving they wish to participate in.
You get to the 1000 mark easy with PADI OW + AOW And as we all know if you want to "look at a pretty fish" below 60 the Operations will ask for AOW card
Show me anyone who can afford to get certified, buy dive equipment and make dives who isn't "affluent".
As far as I have been able to tell, there IS a certification level which almost exactly describes what we are calling a resort diver. The PADI Scuba Diver certification seems like it is about right. The problem seems to be that nobody is getting this certification. It is possible that it just isn't being marketed properly, or the 12 metre/40 foot depth limit is too restrictive. Considering the requirement to dive with a DM or Instructor, you could argue that the limit is too shallow. ACUC (the agency I train with) has a similar certification with a 15 metre/50 foot limit, I'm not sure if the extra 3 metres would be enough to convince people it is a worthwhile certification to have.Having said that I like the idea of seperating a classification of "resort diver" from "independant diver", keeping the current status quo for resort divers and incorporating OW AOW RD with DD PPB and UWNav (using the PADI curicullum as an example) for the independant diver. It makes both camps happy and reasonably safe with no mix up as to what level of training prepares you for what conditions.