Yet, most people dom't want to be a Navy diver. They want to know "just enough".to have fun. Good for them.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Yet, most people dom't want to be a Navy diver. They want to know "just enough".to have fun. Good for them.
Yet, most people dom't want to be a Navy diver. They want to know "just enough".to have fun. Good for them.
Of course some of the "old guard" are still diving 50 years later. The question is how many of the the new guard who go no further than OW or possibly AOW will still be diving 50 years hence.
There is no evidence to support that contention. Peoe should learn and stick to their limits.
I'll venture a guess that, in way less than 50 years from now, given the catastrophic decline in the health/life of earth's oceans, scuba won't exist as a sport anyway.
The path to instructor does need to change. Too many 90 day (or less) wonders. Too many people with outdated teaching skills teaching. But this is about OW.
I like the shift to e-learning. It works and can give the instructor more time in the pool or in OW. However, the biggest change needed in the industry is a price overhaul. The current pricing system was based on being almost a loss leader so that profit could be made on gear sales. Let's double or triple the cost of a basic class so that Instructors can teach smaller classes and not feel the need to cut corners in order to be able to live. The current list of skills as outlined by the RSTC is fine, but the teaching environment is failed due to the number of people needed in each class to make this work. Course length needs to be at the discretion of the instructor,
If there is water, there will be divers. Just go to a quarry or lake on the weekend if you don't believe me.