Streamlining my gear

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

These discussions in the past have made me want to run full speed head first into a brick wall out of frustration,
but I'm going to give it a shot anyway.

You did well to type all of that with serious head trauma.
 
In the Fall 2010 Alert Diver magazine "Diving in Currents", Mike Ange writes: "Water is 800 times denser than air, so it creates resistance magnitudes stronger than the resistance caused by even a storm level wind."

And: "Your dive gear should be streamlined with no dangly items. Even an extended regulator hose or dangling console can create a lot of physically-taxing drag." :eyebrow:
 
Last edited:
Most of the "streamlining" that is suggested has more to do with how it looks than anything else. There are two major fallacies, both stemming from a lack of actual testing. The first I have not tested either, that is clipping your spg, which I object to on other grounds, namely whenever you create a closed circle with your gear you are raising the ante on entanglement, I put my spg under my tank in the small of my back with no clip or securing ... it tends to stay there, except when I pull it out to look at it. The second (and in this case actually demonstrable fallacy) is the idea that all BP/Ws have less drag than any vest. I prefer BP/Ws over vests, for a number of other reasons, but that's for a different thread. Many years ago Steve Paulet and Dave Mclean (both used to be here on SB, they show up once in a while now but you can find them on FaceBook if you want details) did a seminal study of BC drag by towing divers and a dressed manikin in a ship hull tow tank that was instrumented to record the force needed to move through the water. This study included a prototype for what became the SeaQuest ADV as well as the Watergill AT-pac (an early BP/W very similar to modern ones but with a plastic backpack rather than a metal plate, it could be equipped with a fiberglass fairing and was towed with and without its fairing) the results were not what you'd expect. The ADV did best, and the BP/W without the fairing did not do as well, with the fairing it was even worse. I do not know that "modern" BP/Ws would fare the same, just pointing out that there a a lot of noise on the subject and very little hard data.
 

Back
Top Bottom