rstofer
Contributor
So, it's a steel 72. Actually 65 cf at 2250 psi. If the tank is '+' rated, it can be filled to 2475 psi and you will get the nominal 72 cf. Look for a '+' stamped after the most recent hydro stamp.
If you were using Al 80s, it didn't do much for your ballast situation. An Al 80 could be as much as 4# positive at the end of a dive whereas an HP 100 will be 2.5# negative. All else being equal, you need to carry about 7# more lead when you use an Al 80 versus an HP 100.
I have no idea what the buoyancy characteristics are for an LP 72. I have been trying to get the numbers so I can increase the lead in my weight harness. It MIGHT be something like 5# negative when full, neutral when empty. But I'm not sure of tha and I'm not sure that 3# will make a difference. I'm already a little heavy according to DSS.
I get mixed reviews about the buoyancy and trim characteristics of the LP 72. I just want to use it with my Mistral double hose regulator. This particular regulator probably shouldn't see 3000 psi.
Richard
If you were using Al 80s, it didn't do much for your ballast situation. An Al 80 could be as much as 4# positive at the end of a dive whereas an HP 100 will be 2.5# negative. All else being equal, you need to carry about 7# more lead when you use an Al 80 versus an HP 100.
I have no idea what the buoyancy characteristics are for an LP 72. I have been trying to get the numbers so I can increase the lead in my weight harness. It MIGHT be something like 5# negative when full, neutral when empty. But I'm not sure of tha and I'm not sure that 3# will make a difference. I'm already a little heavy according to DSS.
I get mixed reviews about the buoyancy and trim characteristics of the LP 72. I just want to use it with my Mistral double hose regulator. This particular regulator probably shouldn't see 3000 psi.
Richard