A. Boyette
Registered
That sounds like a (process wise) a silly exemption. first first i could have painted tha tank 2 years ago and then took it o a dive trip and had it filled at a new shop. That shop knows nothing of the tank history and can say they fear it. there is no identification on a tank that says the tank under the paint is good, so its up to the whim of that shop owners. now we are back to the old if its an AL tank it will not be filled unless that shop did the vis on it. or they question the origin of the vis sticker ect. I hve seen painted tanks that are colored but see through at the same time. Process wise i do not see any complications with those tanks as far as the inspection goes. Tank failure happens with a .060 deep scratch in it. ANY I repeat ANY repaint will cover that up. From the inspectors view that tank can not be properly certified to be in a usable condition once repainted.
Do you actually know how much 0.06 of an inch is? What the hell kind of paint are you using that will cover up a 1.52 millimeter deep gouge????? Why don't body shops use this special paint instead of using bondo first? Wouldn't that save them a lot of labor? LOL I wanna go set my mill for 1.52 millimeters and cut a grove into an aluminum plate and test this special paint you know of.
Just to CMA, I inquired this evening of my buddy who has painted cars for 20 years as to whether any Imron paint on the market would hide a 1.52 millimeter deep gouge in metal and his reply was a very fast and profanity laced version of, "No" with a lot of exclamation at the end. I also asked my buddy who manufactures his own firearm silencers in his machine shop and he knows of no paint that will cover a 1.52 millimeter gouge in metal.
On a more serious note, that exemption is straight from Luxfer themselves, so that's the standard I use when inspecting their cylinder. I don't pretend to be a metallurgist or an engineer, so I leave the recommendations up to the people who know more than I do about building cylinders and I follow their recommendations. If in your "expert" opinion, it's silly, then that's an issue to take up with Luxfer. Perhaps Luxfer might appreciate your expert advice if they have a cylinder factory in Texas and might even offer you a position on their staff. I toured the Luxfer plant in Graham and found all the suits and nerds wearing white lab coats and safety glasses to be pretty knowledgeable, certainly more knowledgeable than me at making a 10-inch round slug into a scuba cylinder, so forgive me if I'm foolish for trusting their advice.
Of course, any shop can refuse to fill any cylinder with the excuse that "they fear it". Their shop~their rules. In fact, I had one guy who argued with me for DAYS because he brought in his pony bottle to fill, he got it in the mail from the retailer the day before, brand new, straight from Catalina, never had air in it before, and it had a fold all the way down the inside wall. His logic was that because it was "brand new" then it couldn't possibly fail a VIP. He complained to everyone but his Congressman. He calmed down after Catalina told him his brand new pony bottle was garbage and replaced it for him for free under their warranty.
For what it's worth, I would trust a dive shop to be reliable on deciding what they will/won't fill based on any reliable set of standards. Just like you say, there's dive shops that won't fill a 6351 cylinder, even if it has a current hydro/VIP, there's dive shops that won't fill any cylinder unless it has THEIR sticker on it, there's shops that won't fill a cylinder with nitrox unless it has an EAN sticker on it, I even had a kid tell me he couldn't put air in my cylinder because I had an EAN sticker on it because "it was against federal law". There's shops that won't fill a cylinder older than '88 no matter if it's steel or aluminum, they all seem to just make it up as they go along. You basically pick a shop and take your chances until they get to know you. There's even a LDS that won't do a VIP unless you let them rebuild your valve at the same time. Of course their excuse is the old "safety factor" thing. "Cylinder valves are the most neglected piece of dive gear" their website says.
There's no way in heck a cylinder valve needs rebuilding every year under normal use. Again, "Their shop~their rules."
Last edited: