Arubandi07
Contributor
Ok, I don't think I am following the issue....From my perspective, the "recreational fisherman" and Sport Fish market, are both forms of recreation--and in this recreation, the hunt or the chase, is a bigger part of the equation by far than the killing and taking of a fish.....For the health of our fisheries, now at a fraction of the size they would have been at in the 30's and 40's, it would seem to be a "good thing" to me, that fisherman would be willing to catch a fish using heavier gear, to limit the length of the fight, and to improve the probability of the fish surviving to be "enjoyed many more times like this.....Afterall, this sport of Fishing is closer to what you guys do than it is to what divers do, so I would have thought you would have seen this as a better development--as well as leaving more fish stock for commercial take. If 80% of the recreational catch of key species were released and to survive , it would seem to be very positive ....
So where am I getting your side incorrectly?
Where did you get the idea I'm a 'sports' fisherman? I take pictures of fish, and that's all I do ...
And to answer your question: You catch a fish for food, not to play with it ... So in short, regulation of commercial and 'recreational' fishing, yes ... 'Catch and release'? No, in my view not an acceptable compromise. Sometimes, we have to give up things we love ...