Sig line limits

[CBulla]

Actually, I'm on my "support" comp - its got IE7

 

[El Orans]

2560x1024 at 32bit color.

4 lines? When I view page source I find that all sigs are wrapped in a div of the following class:

.sizedsig {
max-height:78px;
height:expression(this.scrollHeight > 78? "78px" : "hidden" );
overflow:hidden;
overflow-x:hidden;
}

My script changes the 78px limit to 128px.....

There's a setting we can use to limit the number of pixels available for a signature.

Your settings should give you more than enough real estate to display any signature?

Got a screen print?

 

[AstroDad]

Actually, I'm on my "support" comp - its got IE7

That's why it no worky.... Ya need Firefox for the Greasemonkey script to work...

 

[AstroDad]

There's a setting we can use to limit the number of pixels available for a signature.

Your settings should give you more than enough real estate to display any signature?

Got a screen print?

Without my script active (Note Colin's sig area): http://www.planetcurran.com/images/sb-0000.jpg

 

[CBulla]

Change your text zoom. That looks monsterous!

 

[AstroDad]

Change your text zoom. That looks monsterous!

??? It's the equiv of 12pt font - I don't call that monsterous....

BTW, What screen res are you running? If you're running a lower res screen than I am, everything will appear larger on your screen...

 

[CBulla]

This is the latest FireFox and IE side by side on a laptop resolution of 1280x800 on a Dell D800 latitude

 

[El Orans]

Without my script active (Note Colin's sig area): http://www.planetcurran.com/images/sb-0000.jpg

Looks like a preference setting on your PC. Which of course is totally up to you.

 

[AstroDad]

Looks like a preference setting on your PC. Which of course is totally up to you.

??? Sounds like a cop-out to me.

I'm not sure why we got here, but it seems as if you guys think I'm complaining about something. My original post, and follow-ups to it, was me sharing a solution that works for me, on my hardware, and I didn't ask or imply that SB should change or do anything. It's not as simple as a single "preference" - I run a multi-head, hi-res desktop and without getting long-winded, any web site that specifies pixel counts (in spacing, fonts, etc) is going to look different from one hardware config to the other - it's just the nature of the beast. I've learned to live with it, I don't complain about it, and I certainly don't feel like arguing about it....

 

[CBulla]

??? Sounds like a cop-out to me.

I'm not sure why we got here, but it seems as if you guys think I'm complaining about something. My original post, and follow-ups to it, was me sharing a solution that works for me, on my hardware, and I didn't ask or imply that SB should change or do anything. It's not as simple as a single "preference" - I run a multi-head, hi-res desktop and without getting long-winded, any web site that specifies pixel counts (in spacing, fonts, etc) is going to look different from one hardware config to the other - it's just the nature of the beast. I've learned to live with it, I don't complain about it, and I certainly don't feel like arguing about it....

Ahh... nope, didn't think you were complaining, just though you at first brought up an issue then realized it may be a tech support issue and since thats part of what I do for a living was just trying to help ya resolve it