- Messages
- 20,641
- Reaction score
- 15,127
- # of dives
- I'm a Fish!
I am an AOW diver that wants more bottom time and thus more breathing gas. For single-tank dives, I really like my backplate & wing setup. No issues with that for those kinds of dives. But I would really love to get some more bottom time and expand my reach/range. I will definitely seek proper training to go beyond my current certification in terms of maximum depth and no-deco limits. But with which setup?
I have scoured these forums and the internet for objective pros and cons for sidemount and backmount setups. (‘Objective’ being the operative word here. Most comments seem to be very much in favour of either sidemount or backmount diving.)
Even though I will not be cave diving or doing penetrations into particularly tight spaces - for which sidemount was originally developed - there are some benefits to sidemount that look very appealing to me. Here’s what I found, or at least the major differences between the two setups.
Backmount:
Sidemount:
- One stable unit, preferred on boats (?)
- Quite heavy to log around on dry land (I don’t have the strongest back in the world)
- Not as streamlined as sidemount (?), but adding stage bottles doesn’t hurt streamlining further
- Two units, may not be as stable on boats if tanks are donned above water
- Tanks can be hauled separately
- Sleeker in the water (?), but adding stage bottles negates this advantage somewhat
- Valves are easier to reach, and visible
A few questions regarding these two lists:
- Anything I missed on either list? There are some question marks in there, any comment on those?
- Is a set of backmount doubles harder or easier to find than sidemount tanks at dive centers/liveaboards (provided I bring my own BC and regulator set)? If itineraries and schedules allow for double tank dives, is one of these configurations easier to get when traveling and renting tanks?
Obviously, there is proper training and setting-up the configuration involved in both. Investment in special gear, too (another, bigger, wing for doubles or a sidemount BC, regulator sets) and maybe in tanks. I already have two steel 12L tanks, though. I just need to put new valves on them and sidemount rigging if I would get into sidemount, or try to build a double set out of them…
Most of my comments have already been weighed in, but here goes.
First off, addressing the elephant in the room that has not really been confronted head-on. You do NOT need to be looking at doubles and sidemount at this point in your diving progression. You are still bound by no-decompression limit diving and you can always use bigger tanks if you are bumping up against your gas before you bump up against NDL. I'm travelling for work and don't have deco-planner on this computer, but at 100-110ft with a big steel bottle you're likely hitting your NDL before you hit your gas limits. If you're diving an AL80, then you shouldn't be diving that deep on an AL80 because of rock bottom issues.
At such time as you are ready to take AN/DP or equivalent to actually push those bottom times, you will have a better understanding of which configuration makes sense. It has been said here, but I will echo it. Unless you intend to dive small cave passages, doubles are the right answer. Certain physical limitations excluded, but I do also sit in the opinion that if you have those types of physical issues you shouldn't be doing those dives because of the increased risk of something going sideways. Those of us that have taken bodies out of the water because of health issues are particularly sensitive to it and I cringe every time I see someone who's shape can only best be described as globular getting into a cave because I'm afraid I'm going to have to take them out and/or putting them back in *spreading ashes sucks almost as much as removing bodies*. There are people with certain shoulder/knee/hip issues and that's why I actually started my cave training in sidemount because my knees are beat to hell and back and I knew I was going to have to go there eventually, but that time has not come yet.
Now, to address the configuration question since I was pretty blunt about it above.
I have been diving doubles since 2008 and sidemount since 2009. I took my initial cave training in sidemount over a decade ago and dove sidemount exclusively in caves until about 4 years ago when I started diving a rack mounted CCR in caves. At that point I started to dive doubles more often in caves because it meant I only had to bring one backplate/wing/regulator set and if I was doing OC dives or CCR it was just which set of gear I put the bp/w and regs on. Since then, I have primarily been diving doubles in caves for OC and using them as bailout for my sidemount CCR. Throughout all of that boat dives and teaching were always done in doubles and sidemount was only used when required for where I was going.
Sidemount undeniably easier to sort out when travelling, but anywhere that you would actually need doubles or sidemount you should be able to find doubles to rent fairly easily.
Why the change? Like I said above, it was mainly convenience driven, but even last week when I had to make 3 trips to and from the water to bring a set of sidemount bottles to the steps at the caves vs. a single trip for doubles, and that one trip actually being easier *by the strict definition of "work" being area under the curve it is actually less work to carry the doubles vs sidemount since it is a single trip. Each of the sidemount trips are less work than the individual trip with doubles but there are more of them. This is changes if you use a cart, but that's a lot of hassle IMO*. It is also significantly easier at the surface both pre-dive and post-dive, and I am a very proficient sidemount diver who can get ready about as fast as someone in doubles can, but it's still a lot of pfaffing about in comparison. Sidemount has its place, but I firmly believe that it is being oversold which is causing headaches for a lot of dive operators.