concollective
Guest
Shark diving, as such, is just plain stupid -- and, more importantly, inconsistent with the principles of ecologically sound diving. I don't mind seeing a shark on a dive -- it's in its habitat, and so am I. But deliberately attracting huge schools of sharks in circumstances calculated to induce a feeding frenzy is completely different.
First -- moralistic questions about whether a diver is "asking for it" aside -- it's an established fact that shark feeding behavior is different in a frenzy. True, there is no evidence that sharks seek out people as food. But that misses the point: the shark that killed the Austrian diver wasn't seeking out human food, just any food, and the diver conveniently served himself up.
Second -- and more importantly to me -- chumming to attract sharks is like any other diving practice that disrupts the natural marine environment. It's a completely artificial human intervention having nothing to do with observing a marine animal in its natural habitat, but rather a selfish manipulation of feeding behaviors just so divers can get a particular kind of fix. If somebody figured out a way to divert the migratory routes of humpback whales so divers could get a closer look, most of the diving community (and non-diving community) would freak out. Or, maybe to be a bit silly about it, if we moved part of a coral reef to a place more convenient to established diving spots, there would be an outcry. How is it really any different with intervening in the behaviors of sharks?
First -- moralistic questions about whether a diver is "asking for it" aside -- it's an established fact that shark feeding behavior is different in a frenzy. True, there is no evidence that sharks seek out people as food. But that misses the point: the shark that killed the Austrian diver wasn't seeking out human food, just any food, and the diver conveniently served himself up.
Second -- and more importantly to me -- chumming to attract sharks is like any other diving practice that disrupts the natural marine environment. It's a completely artificial human intervention having nothing to do with observing a marine animal in its natural habitat, but rather a selfish manipulation of feeding behaviors just so divers can get a particular kind of fix. If somebody figured out a way to divert the migratory routes of humpback whales so divers could get a closer look, most of the diving community (and non-diving community) would freak out. Or, maybe to be a bit silly about it, if we moved part of a coral reef to a place more convenient to established diving spots, there would be an outcry. How is it really any different with intervening in the behaviors of sharks?