pilot fish
Guest
- Messages
- 11,538
- Reaction score
- 6
- # of dives
- 200 - 499
DiveGolfSki:I think you did too. Let's move on for as Yogi has said "the future just isn't what it used to be"
HAPPY BURPDAY.

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
DiveGolfSki:I think you did too. Let's move on for as Yogi has said "the future just isn't what it used to be"
as far as i know, all bodies have been removed from the ships at truk...divebuddysean:I still think the sub should have been left unexplored. I know they dive wrecks with victims onboard like in Truk or elsewhere. It doesn't make it right. That's how I feel, so you think whatever you like.
divebuddysean:I still think the sub should have been left unexplored. I know they dive wrecks with victims onboard like in Truk or elsewhere. It doesn't make it right. That's how I feel, so you think whatever you like.
divebuddysean:They moved this thread, so I missed all the wonderful conversation...
I still think the sub should have been left unexplored. I know they dive wrecks with victims onboard like in Truk or elsewhere. It doesn't make it right. That's how I feel, so you think whatever you like.
I just saw a news story about another sub which was discovered in Thailand. ...
Would it be ok for the Deep Sea Dectectives to dive this sub and explore inside? We definitely know what sub it is. I guess if your standard is truk, then it's fine for us to go dive the sub and do as we will. The new article talked about the sub being US property. Should this be respected? It's in Thai waters.... Just curious how you feel!
... Sean
and what is your evidence of that?scubalaurel:more so than many wreck divers would/do.
JeffG:and what is your evidence of that?