Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
This whole "no BC" thing is bugging me becaue I don't think it's true, so I tried to track down the source. (As others have said, pictures posted of Laurel show her wearing a BC.) I started at the beginning of this thread. The first mention of "no BC" is in post #25 from AADiver69. If he's still watching this thread, perhaps he can provide more info on how he knows that or why he believes that to be true."We don't know that she wasn't using a BC . . .
Ken, I have no hidden agenda. I always post anonymously on public forums due to the sensitive nature of my job. I keep my personal life and professional life separate. I have 30 plus years as a researcher. The topic of whether or not the boat leaving played any part in the death of a diver struck close to heart.
As divers, we can do everything in our power to make sure our equipment is functioning properly, that we dive within our limits and we follow our training. But if the people we rely on to get us back to shore do not do their job, someone could die. And absent definitive proof i.e. either the diver's body or dive computer we cannot determine with 100% certainty either way that the boat leaving did or did not play any part in her death.
Ken you really stepped in it. You should know that you can't use logic on the internet. Lots of haters, lots of know it all's, I don't know why you even try.
You have done more dives, more teaching, ran more boat trips, more vacation trips, ran a dive shop for many years, and worked tirelessly for the Catalina Chamber.
Yet no respect (wow).
I really think that if she had been diving with a buddy she would be alive today.
That's my analysis.