In the context of tech/deco diving, then yes, I guess it would be important. My humble apologies for assuming we were discussing sacs and rec. diving. Most divers I know (including myself) dive exclusively non-deco (rec) diving using standard 80cu. ft tanks, with maybe an occasional 100. In planning these types of dives, I don't know of anybody who calculates their sac. Most divers I know (including myself) pretty much know how to manage their air supply from prior experience and apply common sense, e.g. if you know you're an air hog, you probably won't want to go to 90ft+ depths, or if you do, start your ascent early while you still have half a tank. At least that's what I do, the rule of thirds on deep (90-120fsw) dives just doesn't work for me. Dives are mostly planned around the location and conditions, e.g. depth and currents present.
More power to youse guys who enjoy the deco stuff and all it entails. For me, in my humblest of preferences, all those precise calculations of deco stops and air mixes takes all the fun out of it. Basic nitrox is as far as I care to go.
More power to youse guys who enjoy the deco stuff and all it entails. For me, in my humblest of preferences, all those precise calculations of deco stops and air mixes takes all the fun out of it. Basic nitrox is as far as I care to go.
Originally posted by roakey
It's *extremely* important for planning gas consumption on decompression dives.
It has little use in the recreational arena.
Roak