Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
I believe the problem is in the lack of proper training by the instructors. Oboy theres a can of worms opening. I had a relative who took diving lessons some thirty years ago, who told me horror stories of what the instructors did to you in order to become certified. When I first wanted to take lessons and was making inquiries I was told "we will teach you survival". So time came I took the course, was prepared for what I knew was coming........but alas okay you're certified.......Huh? Yes I did all the skills, but in a controlled atmosphere, sure I could take my mask, regulator, etc. off and replace it, but on my terms. I expected my DI to rip it off/out when I least expected it. You know like would happen in real life. To gauge a "real" reaction, or how easy is it to help or be helped to share air when you both know its coming.
I believe its an okay lets certify everyone, not piss anyone off and give them their cards and bring in the next class. Ka-ching..
How can you react to any emergency situation if you don't know how "you" would react in an emergency situation. This is a MAJOR shortcoming on course leaders.
During a recent pool fun dive I was curious what it was like to actually run out of air. In a safe environment I intentionally let my air lapse..
halemanō;5745294:What about the increased popularity of diving bringing a bunch of people into diving that really shouldn't be diving?
People who are not comfortable being in the water, who are so task overloaded by just breathing, looking at the surface and not floating up to it. What if the reason so many people roto-tiller is not because they got bad training, but because they are constantly looking at the surface due to not really being comfortable underwater, so you have to use a lot of weight 'cause they can't exhale all the way and fin for the surface all the time. Then it's very hard to move in bad trim and they are old and fat and they can't remember to look at their SPG every 5 minutes.
Should the people who perish after running out of air really have even been scuba divers?
:
In my experience every single out of air diver that I saw was out of air because he or she was either not paying attention to air. That was because they were a diver who got certified years ago, have not dove since and traveled to a dive spot overseas somewhere, presented his out of date certification card and local dive operators took it for granted.
Realistically speaking I believe that active divers should be a little more involved in other diver's affairs and voice their opinions when necessary such as swimming up to new divers every once in a while and telling them to check their air supply.
The limitations of J-valve technology notwithstanding, I think the thought behind your suggestion could have some merit. How about technology that would provide a warning when pressure reached some limiting value? Like your gas tank idiot light, or the wake-up call from the front desk? Shouldn't be the only thing you rely on - though some will, so does that make it a bad idea? - but also would provide some helpful redundancy. Don't integrated SPGs do that? Wonder why the mechanical ones haven't evolved that way as well...If the dive industry wants to take OOA prevention seriously then there is an easy fix.
When I started diving we did not use a contents pressure gauge so no gas monitoring was needed. Cylinders were fitted with J valves, when the cylinder pressure dropped to 300psi the gas supply was cut off, you pulled a rod attached to the valve and the pressure was restored and you surfaced.
No OOA divers.
No deaths from OOA.
No blaming the buddy because he didn't save the idiot he was diving with.
If you want to be serious about saving lives then reintroduce the J valve.
I think overall we have a fundamental difference of opinion of what the term "dive buddy" means, or is intended to mean ... because by no stretch of the imagination am I advocating diver dependency. Nor do I think that was ever intended to be a part of buddy diving.
Being part of a team does not imply dependency at all ... ask anyone who plays a sport like basketball, soccer, or baseball. It means understanding your role, how it fits in with the goals of the team and the roles of your teammate(s). Diving's no different ... there are roles and rules, and the purpose of those is to develop a framework for "predictable behavior".
The reality is that every agency advocates buddy diving ... and as long as that continues to be the case, I believe it is their responsibility to train people how to do it. It's one thing to say "here's what you should do" ... it's something else entirely to say "here's how to do it". The latter piece is seriously lacking in most recreational diver training ... and that's what causes people to make poor decisions when something unpredictable occurs.
"Dive buddy" means a lot more than just getting in the water with somebody. It involves mutual participation in the dive plan, active communication during the dive, maintaining an awareness of each other ... and most importantly, it means behaving in such a way that your dive buddy can anticipate what you're likely to do, can understand your communications and body language, and can react to unpredicted events in a way that doesn't leave you wondering what the heck they're doing.
None of that is rocket surgery ... or even particularly difficult. It works the same way as it would on any other activity you do that requires participation from other people.
... Bob (Grateful Diver)
We can only thank God, when our underwater mistake happens that we make it to the surface safely, because no matter what you may think, ultimately he makes the decision