RMV Spinoff from Accident & Incident Discussion - Northernone - aka Cameron Donaldson

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Skip breathing should have no effect on gas uptake (you can't decrease uptake by breathing less). Hypercarbia from skip breathing may have minor contributions to N2 absorption by increased tissue perfusion that could work in the opposite direction. The net effects are very small, in any case.
 
Since we are, sigh, once again back on the topic of skip breathing, let's look at the physiology.

1) you have a required "minute ventilation" (volume breathed per minute) that is a function of metabolic rate, body temperature and stimuli like drugs and CO2;
2) skip breathers do not have lower RMVs because they are "breathing less";
3) skip breathers may have fewer "wasted" breaths; wasted breaths being ventilation that wasn't really necessary for oxygenation or CO2 exchange, but because "you were thinking about your breathing." (See this post)

When you take an "extra" breath, a couple of things happen. You waste that volume of gas, and for a brief time, your alveolar CO2 drops because you have brought in fresh carbon-dioxide-free gas that has yet to exchange with the capillaries. That means that your body wants to breathe a little less in the minute that follows, to preserve CO2 and acid-base balance. At the same time, you used a bit more gas from your tank.
Perhaps sensing that you were breathing more than you really needed to, you try to "breathe less". This usually translates to smaller breaths. Smaller breaths work to preserve homeostasis, because with a larger dead space fraction, those breaths don't keep lowering your CO2, and your body gets back in balance (this is all very subtle - you can't feel it). But with the shallow breaths, you continue to waste gas and your RMV stays higher than physiologically required.

Skip breathers, on the other hand, actually try to breathe less.
Of course, it's not possible. Their bodies drives to respiration (increasing CO2 and decreasing oxygen) mandate that they have the same minute ventilation that they would without skip breathing. But what IS happening is in two parts: acute and chronic.

Acutely, as a skip breather tries to breathe less, his RMV is lower. But his CO2 is rising. His oxygen isn't falling because of all the extra oxygen molecules packed into a breath at depth.
As a result, he'll soon have to breathe MORE to lower his CO2 back to where it belongs.
OR...he/she can become acclimatized to slightly higher pCO2's. But at that point we switch to the chronic state.

At a chronic state of higher pCO2, his metabolic demands haven't changed, and he needs to have exactly the same minute ventilation that he'd required before he started skip breathing.
But at a higher pCO2. And that is where the risk lies. Diving at a higher chronic pCO2 for the benefit of that first couple of minutes when your RMV was briefly lower comes at the price of lower margin when gas density, workload and higher metabolic production of CO2 combine to make you hypercarbic. The skip breather is that much closer to a CO2 "hit" than a normal breather, and DOESN'T have a lower RMV. Gas density, CO2 production and your particular equipment may combine to result in unrecoverable hypercarbia and death.

Learning to breathe efficiently is the key. A brief pause at end inspiration to maximize exchange should be followed by a slow deep exhalation to exhaust the extra molecules of CO2 that accumulated during the pause. This is not a skip. It's just an altered pattern. The required minute ventilation is fixed. It may increase with exercise, and may decrease as a new diver gains experience, calmness and "Zen", but it won't change by breathing less or more.
 
On the model side you're looking at an order of magnitude difference between inert gas fraction and alveolar pressure drop, so even if you vary the latter by some realistically achievable amount, it shouldn't make any practical difference to the result. And they do, BTW, use different values for respiratory quotient, but the range is whooping 0.7 to 1.
 
Hi Boulderjohn,

Does that include breathing rates that are artificially low (including skip breathing). I believe the Doctors (rslinger and compressor) indicated that it does.

What am I missing?

Or, did I miss your (or their) point?

cheers,
m
I believe rsingler made a good response above, and compressor liked my summation, so I assume he agrees.

When I was new to ScubaBoard (a long time ago) and was still a relatively new diver, I started a thread on this very topic in the Ask Dr. Decompression forum, and Dr. Decompression (Dr. Michael Powell) said it very clearly. Since then, we have had about one thread a year on this topic, and they all eventually reach the same understanding.
 
what animal uses its mouth as its main means of breathing
You made a very definitive and wrong statement, namely "Apart from the fact that no animal other than humans breath through the mouth"

I have zero interest in listing out every animal that can and does breath thru mouth as well as nose because it would take too long and it's amazing you believe that only humans can breath thru their mouth.
 
Because this is a very common misconception, I want to make sure people reading this are not confused.

After he wrote that, mac64 was asked to explain why it would impact DCS, and he wrote:
He was then asked what oxygen transfer had to do with DCS, and he did not directly respond. In his following comments, he talked about oxygen and carbon dioxide. If he mentioned nitrogen intake, the primary factor in DCS, I missed it.

A link was provided to another thread dealing with this topic. So that people don't have to work their way through it, I will quote part of a post by Dr. Simon Mitchell, one of the world's foremost authorities on decompression theory:



As a quick summary, if a diver's increased workload increases perfusion (blood flow through tissues), then that will affect nitrogen loading. It is also likely to increase breathing rates, so an increased breathing rate may be associated with increased nitrogen uptake, but only because of the increase in perfusion. Breathing rate by itself has no real effect on nitrogen loading and has no impact on DCS.
Good call, the poster is making statements that are not supported then changing the subject or trying to pretend he didn't say what he did for whatever reason.
 
Good call, the poster is making statements that are not supported then changing the subject or trying to pretend he didn't say what he did for whatever reason.
It's called "Let's talk about something else" AKA red herring fallacy
 
...Learning to breathe efficiently is the key. A brief pause at end inspiration to maximize exchange should be followed by a slow deep exhalation to exhaust the extra molecules of CO2 that accumulated during the pause. This is not a skip. It's just an altered pattern. The required minute ventilation is fixed. It may change with exercise, but it won't change by breathing less or more.

I would "like" this several more times if it were possible. Thanks @rsingler
 

Back
Top Bottom