Ok, I do understand the physics involved.
I think that there is more than the lung/regulator
depth differential coming into play.
I have performed this experiment.
2 different regulators, exact same conditions, different results.
Here is the observation
Standing on the bottom of a 12 ft pool.
I'm 6'ft tall so the regulator is at about 6 ft.
I look straight forward and take a breath.
I then I tilt my head back look up and take another breath
and compare.
Looking forward I can breath just fine no problems with both regs.
When looking up, with 1 regulator it is VERY hard to breath.
This isn't a slight increase in effort. No, it becomes impossible
to suck a breath.
The other breaths just fine but breaths very wet.
With 1 regulator the amount of effort increases as the angle
looking up increases until it becomes impossible to suck hard
enough to breath. Like trying to take a breath through a
swizzle stick that eventually gets plugged up.
With the other, it simply starts to beath wetter and wetter.
Also, if I tilt my head to the side even slightly, it makes a big
difference on the regulator that gets hard to breath. It
becomes possible to breath while looking up. It still takes
alot more effort but becomes possible to get a breath.
Neither regulator changes in the amount of effort required to
exhale.
In another experiment.
I have also noticed that if I take a VERY quick short high suction
breath (1 second or less),
my lungs will fill with substantially more air when I am in
a head down position vs a head up position.
This I always attributed to my regulator compensating
for a lower depth than my lungs were it. It seemed to make sense.
The regulators are different styles.
The one that gets hard to breath is a Aeris sport.
The one that gets wet is a shadow+ octo inflator.
--- bill