Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
You should reread the above post. we're not discussing stages.
You mentioned 'dropping gas'. That wasn't very explanatory.
The 'thread' is about configuration of 'tec gear'.. in the 'technical diving' forum. Consideration of a buoyancy strategy and appropriate redundancy for technical diving should incorporate the use of stages. The OP didn't specify what type of 'tec diving' he wanted to configure his gear for - because he probably doesn't know - but I didn't assume cave would be the focus. For general 'tec' - stages are a given, for cave they aren't.
If you were talking about a dive with no stages, then my comments can still apply. For a properly weighted diver in balanced kit, with no stages, it's even more straightforward.
Wetsuit + Ali Doubles + Ali Backplate = maintains ditchable weight to off-set cylinder buoyancy as gas is consumed.
Buoyancy failure on Entry (negative doubles) - ditch weight & exit.
Buoyancy failure on Exit (neutral - positive doubles) - exit.
Assuming rule of thirds is used, and again - the rig is well considered and balanced - then the diver would only be marginally negative for the entry (1st third). Approximately neutral for the exit (2nd third) and marginally positive for the contingency (3rd third). They would carry weight to off-set the potential buoyancy of near-empty cylinders. That weight could be ditched for an exit if the wing failed.
drysuit will be your usual go to for redundant buoyancy. This is obviously a rather rare occurrence. While not necessarily ideal, a drysuit is easier to control than a lift bag and less irritating than a dual bladder wing which just gets in the way