With respect, the discrepancies are not innuendo according to a number of independent parties who scrutinised them. They believe these discrepancies do indeed have merit, and apparently this is why a number of media outlets published them.
What makes the record even more dubious imho, was the record holders subsequent attempt to explain each query raised, in many cases he couldn't provide a rational explanation - Fact Or Fiction? World Record Holder Ahmed Gabr Responds To Allegations - DeeperBlue.com
Agree, but I suppose with the media attention it has gotten, you would imagine Guinness are aware of the discrepancies in the record now. The interesting bit will be, what are Guinness going to do about these valid queries that the record holder cant answer?
Seems to me, it would be more of a concern if he had an immediate rationale to every question as it's asked.
Being baffled by how this could be coming up now, when all was above board in his mind, might make it difficult.