I'm looking to purchase a back up spare breathing pony bottle system for recreational diving here in So. Cal. People have recommended the Spare Air others says go to a 6cf rig and yet others say go for a 13cf. I'm not a tech diver and the deepest I have ever gone is 100, but I usually stay between 40 to max 80 feet max. Any suggestions??? Thanks, Vlad
The answer may depend in part on how people interpret the phrase 'back up spare pony bottle system'. As a preamble, it is fine (and absurdly irrelevant) to say that
use of proper gas management and proper buddy skills means you will never need a pony. Proper gas management INCLUDES consideration of a redundant air supply. I may have great buddy skills but be paired either with a complete putz, or someone (like me) who justifiably does not accept that his/her buddy 'owns' any part of their gas supply.
I interpret your statement to mean a redundant air source that will allow you to safely a) terminate your dive, and b) surface, if you have a catastrophic failure of you primary air supply at the most extreme point in your dive (deepest, farthest from the ascent line / surface / whatever.
IF that is your goal, then some calculation of how much air it will take to accomplish those objectives is a good basis for determining the needed size. The deepest you have ever gone is 100 ft, so you could use that as an 'extreme point' for planning. Better yet, use the depth limit of recreational diving - 130 ft - as the basis.
Do you know your air consumption rate (SAC/RMV)? If not, use something conservative (i.e. higher than it probably is), say 1 cfm, for planning. The better approach is to measure YOUR specific consumption rate.
At 130 ft, with a SAC of ~1 cfm, you are using ~ 5 cfm. If you have a catastrophic gas supply failure, do you think your gas consumption will remain the same, or possibly increase? That question is a bit of a set up. It probably will go up. Will it double? Will it increase by 25%? Who knows. For planning, why not assume it will increase by 50%, to 1.5 cfm. This is something of a worst case scenario, but why not use the worst case? Hope for the best, plan for the worst.
So, you are at 130 ft, and you have a catastrophic gas supply failure. How much gas do you need in a redundant air supply, to allow you to a) figure out what is happening, then b) begin, sustain, and successfully complete a normal ascent? Figure a minute at depth to change to your redundant air supply, sort things out, get to the ascent line, etc., then 4 minutes to ascend comfortably at 30 ft / min to a safety stop depth, then 3 minutes at the safety stop. VERY roughly, at an assumed increased consumption rate, you may be looking at needing as much as 30 cf. Gas goes quickly when you are under stress, and things are not going well.
Sounds like a lot, sounds like it is probably more than you would actually need. In my own case, I dive with either a 30 cf or a 40 cf pony bottle, as a redundant gas supply. I have never needed it, but that fact has no predictive value for the future. But,
IF I need it, I have a redundant supply that makes sense. It may not be enough, or both gas supplies may fail, . . . - the list of statistically improbable outcomes is long. But, I am pretty sure that, diving within recreational limits, I should have an adequate redundant supply to deal with most contingencies.
In reality, your SAC rate may be a bit lower than 1 cfm. In reality, the urgency of a situation such as a catastrophic gas supply failure might drive you to ascend at 60 ft / min (or more), in reality you may decide to blow off the safety stop. You may need less gas. But, if I am going to plan for the worst, I am going to do just that. Otherwise, I will not dive deeper than 60 ft, and I will carry only a 3 cf Spare. (And, in my spare time, I will go to Las Vegas or Atlantic City, and put all my available funds on the table, and HOPE for a big win that will take care of my retirement.)
What size to buy? I see little point in anything less than a 30 cf bottle. If I can absolutely be sure I will not go deeper than 60 ft, I could argue for something smaller. But then, the issue is, why go smaller than 19? With a 19 cf bottle, I can scab the bottle to my main gas supply. I still need to buy the bottle, I still need a regulator for the pony, I still need to VIP it, hydro it., etc. 6 vs 13 vs 19 - it makes almost no difference in cost or 'cumbersomeness'. Moving from 19 to 30 means moving from a bottle attached to you main gas supply, to a slung bottle.
In the end, however, it is entirely up to you. To paraphrase Clint Eastwood, 'Do you feel lucky?'