Exactly. Especially given the highly narcotic properties of CO2.How exactly will you know when the increase in CO2 doesn't make a difference? How does one gauge when skip breathing will retain just enough CO2 to not be problematic?
Thinking it is doable at PO2 upwards of 1.0 also implioes doing it at greater depths and greater ENDs. So in effect, it potentially is working counter to any attempt to limit END - trimix, decreased MOD, etc.
Personally I'd prefer to turn the dive a couple hundred feet sooner, or take a stage to extend the penetratiopn than deal with the extra narcosis caused by elevated CO2 levels from skip breathing. But to each his own.
My major beef here is that we should not be promoting a practice without also fully informing people of the problems that may result. Personally, I think many of the issues where divers report being excessively narced at a reasonable END around 100 ft are potentially related to CO2 retention.
In cave diving, the rules related to training (1/6ths in doubles at Intro), peer pressure (real or just imagined), and/or in some cases a personal ego driven need not to be the person who turns the dive on gas and/or the desire to push the penetration on a given amount of gas a few hundred feet farther all contribute to the number of skip breathing divers out there who are, in my opinion, placing themselves and their teams at risk with elevated CO2 levels and uneccesarily impaired judgment at any given END.
Then we as a community make a bad situation worse by coveting low SAC rates and associating them with being a "better" diver. If adiver wants to improve SAC rate, they need to do it through increasing fitness, not through skip breathing. Similarly, if they need more distance for any given SAC, they need to bring more gas.