I am confused.
So based on the ground there is no safety stop are you stating that a CESA at 60 fpm is safer than ascend at 30 fpm getting one-two breaths from regs/BCD/whatever?
I never said that. What I meant was that if I am OOA, I will ascend at 60 fpm so that I can be sure to reach the surface. The fact that it might be marginally safer from a DCS point of view (an improvement from say 99.92% safe to 99.96% safe) is not enough of a benefit for me to worry about in comparison to not reaching the surface when I am out of air. In this situation, the risk of DCS is very, very remote, but the risk associated with OOA is very, very real. I will not sacrifice the real threat for the benefit of the remote threat.
Similarly, if I am driving someone who is suffering from a heart attack to the hospital, I will likely risk driving a few miles per hour over the speed limit, deciding that the risk of a speeding ticked is less significant than the risk of the person dying. I will not, however speed to the point of creating a significant danger of crashing. (Just as I will not sprint to the surface with a CESA.)
As I said earlier, I will happily breathe the air from my regulator as I ascend should I need it. I will not, however, discard that valuable regulator to suck on my BCD inflator.
Do you routinely ascend at 60 fpm? If that's the case, then by ascending at 60 fpm you aren't really doing anything different, except for avoiding a safety stop (assuming no-deco).
I do not normally ascend at 60 fpm, but if I were to do so it would not concern me. Many people do ascend at 60 fpm, and, yes, if they were to do so on a CESA, it would be exactly the same as a normal ascent. In fact, PADI considers 60 fpm to be a normal ascent rate, and it advocates maintaining that ascent rate as an ideal for the CESA.
And if you do not routinely ascend at 60 fpm, that implies you do not consider that speed so safe, right?
I prefer vanilla ice cream. That does not mean I don't like chocolate.
More details on the DAN study:
They compared three ascent rates: 10 fpm, 30 fpm, and 60 fpm. 30 fpm had the best results in terms of bubble detection, and 10 fpm had the worst. For that reason, I prefer a 30 fpm ascent rate. The 60 fpm was not, however, determined to be unsafe. It is still an acceptable, safe ascent rate. The probability of getting DCS with either rate rounds off to 0%.