That is not what being self reliant, or a buddy is about at all. We are self reliant so we can help ourselves. By being able to help ourselves, we are in a better position to help others.
I would not dive with anyone who told me any tank was theirs, not mine. To me, that is a red flag. It's just a tank of air. Anyone needing air can use anything I have and we'll figure the details out after the stress of the event has passed.
If my recreational buddy was LOA or OOA, we would be heading up anyway.
If I'm buddying with someone who doesn't have redundancy in an overhead environment, I've made the big mistake before we splashed.
I also would not dive a blind tank, unless I were diving vintage, in which case I would have other strategies in place.
Hey DaleC,
I don't have a collectivist attitude as you evidently do. I don't dive to save the world! I dive for fun. I solo dive to avoid dangerous situations (like scary insta-buddies). If a diver is looking for me to save his sorry arse, he chose the wrong person. I am not a trained instructor nor am I a former member of the Teams. Your PADI rescue cert may make you feel good, but trust me, it does not make you a real rescue diver. It is good to know the techniques, but a one weekend cert class does not include the years of training and repetition behind it to do the job correctly, every time, especially when diving with newbie divers.
When the safest person around is myself, I solo dive. I am not a self-reliant diver so that I can be a better buddy! I was always a good buddy because I took my responsibility seriously; I never leave formation because you don't leave your wing-man. Others don't share my tactics; once an SOB buddy leaves formation, you are solo diving. I learned to Solo dive so that
I can avoid dangerous situations.
Oh yeah, I don't do overhead environments nor does the OP (as best I can tell) so please avoid couching things as an overhead or staged decompression scenario.
As a former tug boat captain and construction worker, giving a no-bulloney briefing is a great way to get people to pay attention to what you are telling them.
The octo is yours, the pony is mine!!!!The statement stands! "And now, insta-buddy, grab my octo and make sure it works."
We also discuss separation, navigation issues, and my expectation to check their gas consumption regularly. Also, it is fine to swim with the current, but when I give the "boat" signal, one of us will turn towards the boat, the other can remain in formation if they want! It is sometimes called, "thumbing the dive."
Diving a blind tank is what back mounted tank diving is, right? Or, are you using techy jargon for no spg?
What follows is not a response to DaleC:
I have read this thread and some people are relating the OPs question to tech diving protocols. He does not sound like a tech diver to me. The OP does not need 38 cf of pony bottle for himself and another 38 cf for his son--ridiculous.
I have a love-hate relationship with Scuba Board. I enjoy it so much until a person gets judged by a holier-than-thou tech diver who believes tech diving protocols are gospel for us rec divers. I have not dived deeper than 55' in 9 months. And yes, I have been diving (multiple trips to Monterey and multiple trips to the Northern Channel Islands on live-aboards).
Hey OP, your 19 cf tanks are more than enough as long as you stick with recreational diving protocols. If you get into a situation that requires more gas to save yourself, and/or your buddy, you probably are not recreational diving! Three redundant systems are not going to fail you leaving one 19 cf tank for both you and your buddy.
Sorry about the rant, and no DaleC, it is not directed entirely at you!
markm