Lehmann108
Guest
None. They're ridiculous and make equalization difficult. Almost as useful as those flip-up fins.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Walter:I'm sorry you are having difficulty understanding the concept being discussed. I'll rephrase, just for you, Bob.
They aren't necessary to allow a diver to clear their mask with ease.
Don Janni:I guess I'll challange that Walter. It's easier with a purge. It's 'Easy" without and "Easier" with. So if one wants the ultimate in "easy" it's the mask with a purge.
I am not sure that is what is being said. I have found the purge on my OMs to be failure prone (not using one at the moment because the cover simply came off during a dive, and can’t get the kit to repair it). But, this is at least one failure point that can be avoided, by using non-purge masks.diverbob:As fas as people that say anything that can fail, will, so avoid it, should none uf u ever dive, because O-rings, burst disks and regs can fail, too.
That is probably the best point. They aren’t. You can clear a non-purge easily – having used both types I didn’t find purges to be easier (or harder) . Having the purge doesn’t add a lot for many folks. But, I don’t read anyone as saying they are bad, the work of the devil, evil incarnate, whatever. If they work for you, fine, Are they essential? No. Will they fail? Probably.walter:They aren’t necessary.