ScoobaChef
Contributor
Now to answer John's original question, I see the two sides in the argument a bit differently than his two choices.
- One side that is pushing for a rebreather design that is on par with recreational oc in simplicity, ease of assembly and general fail-safedness. Basically removing the user's discipline and attention to detail from the equation(or at least reducing it to the level required for OW)
-the other side that is supportive of improvements in reliability and safety, but still feel that there will never be a level of improvement that will remove the need for a trained diver with checklists and a high degree of care to ensure safe operating.
- One side that is pushing for a rebreather design that is on par with recreational oc in simplicity, ease of assembly and general fail-safedness. Basically removing the user's discipline and attention to detail from the equation(or at least reducing it to the level required for OW)
-the other side that is supportive of improvements in reliability and safety, but still feel that there will never be a level of improvement that will remove the need for a trained diver with checklists and a high degree of care to ensure safe operating.