Question(s):
(A) Do people believe that low quality training is one cause of the gradual decline of the industry?
(B) If yes, does anyone think the training agencies would be willing to accept a sudden decline of revenue prior to the returns of higher quality training? (meaning more con ed). The higher quality instruction shops in my area have much higher retention rates than the lower quality instruction ones.
Those are 2 loaded questions - a bit much on Christmas eve, maybe, but here's a take on it.
We train a bunch of new divers every year. About 150K Americans become newly certified divers every year (pre-pandemic).
But the participation rate steadily drops. For instance, pre-pandemic, 237K fewer Americans were participating in scuba diving (having done at least one dive in the prior 12 months) in 2017 than in 2016.
So, we actually lost close to 400K participants.
We often talk about recruiting new divers. But I think we should primarily focus on keeping current divers, especially the new ones.
@Beau Holden mentioned in a post above how dive shops in his area don't seem to cater to current divers. Same idea.
Now, why are people dropping out? There are as many reasons as there are people dropping out. For sure, there are a bunch of baby boomers hanging up their fins or signing out of this planet. But I believe it is undeniable that the lack of quality in training results in a bunch of new divers never really becoming divers.
We are currently running an InDepth/Scubanomics survey precisely on this, and the preliminary results are stunning. People do not feel ready to dive after receiving a c-card trumpeting they are. So, yes, I believe there is a correlation between the lack of quality (not just in training but in customer service and general experience) and the decline of scuba diving while so many other outdoor activities are booming. It's hard to prove because drop-out divers are hard to survey.
As for the training agencies... They make the bulk of their money with new divers, and so do many dive gear manufacturers. If I spend more time with my student divers in the pool and do more dives with them, the training agency gets nothing. If I push these ones out and start a new group, the training agency gets its profits.
And it's the same with new instructors, for that matter. I was watching PADI videos last night for my online Course Director update, and they had a graph showing that new instructors are productive in the first 3 years, and after that, not much. The message was that we needed to train more instructors. Well, to me, the message was that we need to improve the economics of being a dive instructor so that they are not all just flares.
We have short-lived divers and short-lived instructors.
We need to move away from training agencies having such a dominant role in our industry. As Alex Brylske keeps on saying, we need a new paradigm with a focus on diving, not on selling courses.
Happy Holidays! Dive safe!
P.S.: If you want to take part in that survey, here it is:
Survey: Quality of Entry-Level Scuba Diving Experiences