- Messages
- 20,641
- Reaction score
- 15,128
- # of dives
- I'm a Fish!
Reckon that the Revo could have two (or three) of those cells with the outputs shared across the controller (Petrel) and monitor (Nerd). Although there's then a shared failure point.
If there's only 2 or 3 Solid State sensor cells used, the spare Revo cell tray space could be taken up by the electronics (maybe, if it fits).
Hopefully those cells are good for the big-time. There can only be a few hundred Poseidon units at most. Once others start using them any weaknesses will come out on show.
Hopefully the manufacturers will make the effort to design upgrades into their systems.
On any of the DiveCAN units there is an ADC board that handles conversion of the analog mV signal from the sensors and converts it to a digital signal for the SOLOE to interpret. This signal is then shared with the OBOE but they are separate nodes *exception being SF2 and maybe some others that use a mini-SOLOE board*. Since everything is digital, you can get things like signal validation that we don't have with the analog sharing. Shared failure points on these types of electronics are really not an issue because if the unit fails you will get a failure alert vs. what you have with analog cells where you get an erratic signal but the computers can't do anything about it outside of voting logic. These types of sensors will remove any argument for the 4 or 5 sensor arrangement we have which was unnecessary with the galvanic cells, but would be nothing short of ridiculous with these.
Sensors are rated with a life expectancy of greater than 5 years in industrial settings, I suspect that in rebreathers they will last considerably longer since they are not being used constantly.