SparticleBrane
Contributor
Yeh, I saw that, too. Just a typo.
Uh... was I supposed to answer something on the test reports? I looked back through your posts and didn't see a specific question on these.
They look good. In fact these show EXACTLY what WD8CDH was talking about in post #51 about "rounding out" the cylinder. Notice that your pre-test permanent expansions came in at 2.3cc and 1.1cc. Then, at actual test pressure, the perm was only 0.3cc and 0.5cc, respectively. Had those first pre-tests actually experienced permanent expansion due to yield, when you went up to the higher test pressure, you would have seen a lot MORE perm. Instead, the perm dropped, indicating that the cylinders had a set that was rounded out during the pre-test, and then came out with flying colors up at the actual test pressure.
DG
Sorry, I should have specified -- I was just posting them for general knowledge, and if you had any comments on the differences between the two, any would be appreciated (which is exactly what you did).
I was quite happy with the way those hydros were performed. I sent a friend to this facility recently with some PST 130s -- hopefully those will pass and he'll let me know if hydro tests are still $9.50 like mine were last year.