Just to clear up some PLB air.
LEOSAR is just one network of satellites within the COSPAS-SARSAT network. It uses some clever Doppler wizardry that allows it to triangulate the position of a distress beacon. This is possible because the satellites whiz around. However is also means the coverage area changes.
GEOSAR is the next set of system architecture. These satellites are in geosynchronous orbit. While this means the coverage area does not change, it also means that it cannot triangulate the position of the distress beacon, and is only capable of relaying the information transmitted by the beacon. Practically speaking it means that the beacon must include positional data within its transmission.
MEOSAR is the latest generation of system architecture. It’s sort of a best-of-both-worlds operation and should allow both triangulation as well as increased coverage. This satellite array is still being built, and will continue to expand in the future.
Delays are almost always due to the response chain from the MCC to the proper authorities. With a PLB, the satellite reception of the distress beacon, outside of some exceptional situations, near instantaneous. The response to that signal is what takes time.
While a PAB may be a near instantaneous response, it is entirely dependent on a receiver actually receiving the transmission, and having the hardware to decode the data.
A VHF radio also has this near instantaneous response ability, but again, is dependent on having a receiver of the signal that can act on the signal.
Ultimately, if you can carry all three, it would be beneficial to do so.