Perdix's AI, what they got right, what could be better

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Chicken SCUBA:
As an example of my point, I did a training dive to 140 for 13. I started my ascent on time and was showing 10 minutes to surface (as planned). It was a shore dive with lowish vis so I followed the contour of the bottom/wall. My ascent was too slow and I racked up an extra 4 minutes by the time I reached my deep stop. If I had followed my plan only I would not have realized that I had on gassed so much during my slow ascent.
Click to expand...

Most reasonable planning software, including the Suunto one, lets you choose an ascent rate. When first forced to follow a plan that includes a 10m/minute ascent many divers fail to arrive at their stops on time. Planning with a realistic ascent rate is important.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

E
Feature request — Events time saving and compass on gauge mode
Replies
1
Views
201
crofrog
C
O
1 Transmitter for Suunto Eon Core and D4i
Replies
3
Views
291
Valeriy Vakshul
Valeriy Vakshul
C
Perdix AI Battery Drain Issue
7 8 9
Replies
84
Views
4,837
CWK
C
TMurrr
Sold! Suunto Tank Pod x2 & Eon Core
2
Replies
11
Views
1,130
TMurrr
TMurrr
Fastmarc
Info Care to share what you have your Shearwater displaying?
6 7 8
Replies
75
Views
10,436
Soloist
Soloist
https://www.shearwater.com/products/perdix-ai/

Back
Top Bottom