Go back, at the moment I realized Kirk was gone, and find him. Points being that, at that moment, I knew where I had last seen him and it wasn't far; seven minutes later, after I had escorted the OOG diver to the surface and returned, he could be anywhere. Also, we were at the end of the dive with our lowest gas reserves, and if he was highly stressed, he could blow through a lot of gas in that length of time. I still don't know if that was right; the idea of doing a buddy search with an OOG diver on my long hose still doesn't sit well with me. But Danny is a very wise man.
Back to the original topic -- I was thinking about some of the training scenarios I've done. For example, on the first dive I did with one of my instructors, after pulling a runaway wing inflator on us on descent, when we went down the second time, I shot a bag and tied it off as an upline. My buddy was running line and began to swim off, at which point I realized I was entangled in the upline. I signaled, but he didn't catch it, and he therefore got a fair bit away (25 or 30 feet, maybe) before he realized I wasn't with him. He turned and was immediately put out of gas. He swam to me and I donated (this was no biggie) and then I put my backup in my mouth and inhaled . . . and there was nothing there. So, I'm tied up in the line, my buddy has my primary reg, and I can't breathe. Of course, it immediately occurred to me that I had a left post rolloff, so I reached up and turned on the post. But I had never had anyone turn off my gas without telling me about it before, so this came as out of the blue as it would have in a real situation.
I deal with it calmly. BUT -- was that because of training, or temperament? Does this type of scenario-based education actually extinguish the tendency to panic, or does it simply select for people who are unlikely to get flustered in the first place?