Hmmm... Perhaps the prime example where an easy comparison can be made is Bonaire. The whole reef, all the way around the Island, is a marine park and has been for quite a while. No dynamite, no cyanide, trawling, anchoring... if there is any agricultural runoff I can't imagine where it'd come from, and even if there were, it'd be distributed all 'round the Island.deepblueme:"As was mentioned in a prior post, PADI has significant marketing muscle as opposed to some of the other agencies. Should not they use that muscle to promote more ecologically sound diving practices?"
This sounds like PADI divers are killing the reef and it makes me laugh.
Have you seen what a hurricane does? (want to talk silting)
Dynamite/cyanide fishing?
Trawling?
Fertilizer?
Parrot fish?
Dragging anchors?
Yes I do very much agree that basic bouyancy control is very important to the health of the reef but to put the blame on divers is silly.
What isn't distributed equally around the Island is... Divers. Divers visit the lee side almost exclusively; the difference is dramatic and remarkable, especially soft coral density. My conclusion is that divers with poor buoyancy control have to be the cause of most of the damage on the lee side. And it is substantial.
Rick