PhilEllis:
You have the idea. Remember, PADI doesn't completely know how it will flow, but common sense would lead us to some logical conclusions. It could be either of the ideas you advanced. The student would get a password and would use the computer just like the "book". What would be different from the current situation is the record keeping. PADI would maintain that. PADI (throught the online program provider) would administer the final exam. Remember, the student will be in contact with the dive center almost immediately after the sign-up begins. An instructor might choose to add some additional academic sessions or might choose not to add them, but to go directly to the pool. In any event, the student (upon compeletion of the online course) would get a printed referral document, just like the current referrals used to send a confined student to a different open-water checkout instructor. In the end, remember the local scuba instructor IS STILL TEACHING the customer how to scuba dive. The instructor would maintain all of the ability to adjust as they currently have.
Excellent. Thanks for the clarification Phil. That goes a long way to easing my mind.
PhilEllis:
I cannot possibly see how it is not good for the student. The student gets to do the academic learning they way they choose.....on the internet. If they don't want to do it on the internet, I can't imagine why they would sign up for a class on the internet.
The other proposition you offer----crap dive center and crap instructor, importance of customer meeting the instructor in advance-----is one of the biggest straw men openly discussed on chat boards about scuba instuction. In MOST cases, a potential student would not have the capability to tell a good instructor from a bad one. When it comes to signing up for classes in a dive center, most new students don't even meet the instructor in advance. They sign up, make their purchases, and are scheduled for a class. I personally have NEVER had a customer ask to "interview" one of my instructors prior to class. We teach in excess of 150 open water students per year, so if this was a common practice, I would expect to have had at least ONE customer make this request. I think our customers take a look around our store, make observations about how the place is operated and maintained, and develp an opinion of how the course might be operated (and the quality of the staff of the store, including instructors) based on the first-hand impressions of the sales person helping them sign up for the class.
I agree it doesnt happen very often, and the OW diver wannabe wouldnt know the difference anyway, but I have been interviewed in some manner or other by perhaps a dozen (out of about 70 or so that I have certified) of my students before teaching. Now granted most of these were for con-ed classes but it does tell me there are some switched on people out there and they want value for money. I think however that these kinds of people will tend to avoid e-learning anyway and will shop around in the traditional manner, so no worries there.
But the risk of getting a 100 dive wonder instructor is very real. Some of these might be quite talented but I guess the reality is that an instructor doesnt need to be a particularly flash diver to teach something like OW.
However one of the big things I have found is that a lot of these 100 dive wonder instructors (100DWI for short) were generally taught by another 100DWI. The IDC and IE isnt particularly demanding, nor does it really have time to focus on a lot of the small details and as long as an IE candidate has a little knowledge, and can demonstrate the skills relatively well, they pass and become and Instructor.
However along the way things get left out and in turn the next 100DWI that was taught by the previous, leaves something out and the end result is that classes get poorer, and the divers get poorer along the way.
Heres a little story;
http://www.scubaboard.com/showthread.php?p=2408990&posted=1#post2408990
PhilEllis:
On the issue of independent instructors, I think PADI will be forced to develop some type of system that allows independent instructors to get referrals from the online program. Of course, if an independent is really serious, they can establish themselves as a business. And by that I don't mean getting some business cards. I mean a proper license in their city, county, and state. Obtaining general liability insurance in addition to the professional insurance. All of the 'stuff' that goes along with being in business.
This is what I have already done although I am still in the process of setting it up. I have an incorporated company (Kiwi Divers 2006 Limited), a business number, tax number etc. As the company earns more money I will get a website set up and advertise etc.
PhilEllis:
I just remembered one more thing............
Reading this thread and many, many others on this chatboard and others brings me to a thought that I have often, but don't voice because of the fire-storm it often creates. We take this scuba diving business and all of its surroundings, including instruction, WAY too serious. This is a safe sport. Were it not, we would see an AMAZING number of injuries and deaths. As scuba divers (already trained and experienced) we take the "well-being" of potential newcomers to our sport WAY too serious. Let me give you a couple of examples......
I agree with you however there is still cause for concern.
In New Zealand we have about 6 divers per year die or go missing while diving. Most of it is down to stupid stuff that they should have been taught, maybe they have and maybe they havent.
But 6 divers per year are still far too muny for my liking. I can understand freak accidents but none of these have been such. Just stupid ****.
I have a wee story to tell of one incident down here that happened as a direct result of the commerce side of diving. 3 Divers perished in one dive, and 3 others were badly bent and scarred.
Right now I dont have time to tell the story as my wife is on my back to mow the lawns but I will return and post a link as soon as I can
Ciao