Leatherboot69
Contributor
I had an enjoyable Sunday morning reading this thread from start to finish. It seems - in sum - that agencies (including PADI) have published training standards that are research backed and that allow recreational divers to dive within certain risk tolerances, but that some commenters on the thread do not think that those standards are correct based on several reasons ranging from conjecture and opinion to anecdotal experience to interpretation of subsequent research.
I was taught gas planning at OW, AOW and Deep Spec levels. I’ve found I’ve had relatively limited need until recently to use the calculations for single tank NDL air dives in the <30m range rather than just knowing my turn pressure and reserve, which of course is how millions of dives each year are safely conducted. The main reason I’ve started using them is to prevent skill fade rather than because they have been intrinsically useful on a dive. I would definitely use them for dives in the 30-40m range where risk tolerances are lower because of the increased gas consumption and shorter NDL times, as well as having less experience at those depths and so less instinctive understanding upon which to base decision making.
I’m actually quite confident in PADI standards for NDL recreational diving in circumstances similar to in which I’ve been trained or in which I have developed experience - which is, of course, all I am certified for. There is no incentive whatsoever for PADI to publish training standards or other material that is unsafe.
I was taught gas planning at OW, AOW and Deep Spec levels. I’ve found I’ve had relatively limited need until recently to use the calculations for single tank NDL air dives in the <30m range rather than just knowing my turn pressure and reserve, which of course is how millions of dives each year are safely conducted. The main reason I’ve started using them is to prevent skill fade rather than because they have been intrinsically useful on a dive. I would definitely use them for dives in the 30-40m range where risk tolerances are lower because of the increased gas consumption and shorter NDL times, as well as having less experience at those depths and so less instinctive understanding upon which to base decision making.
I’m actually quite confident in PADI standards for NDL recreational diving in circumstances similar to in which I’ve been trained or in which I have developed experience - which is, of course, all I am certified for. There is no incentive whatsoever for PADI to publish training standards or other material that is unsafe.