You know, I'm going to reserve judgment on this, cuz this is the story the Capt. James posted on CalDFW's page:
"
Adam C James
posted to
Last year I called Cal Tip four times to inform CDFW about poachers. Out of the four calls I made they caught two groups of poachers and I was real happy for helping my state. In the early winter of 2012 I wanted to start commercial fishing off my boat. I called California Department of Fish and Wildlife to find out what licensing i need to legally catch and sell fish. When i called, they gave me the information they thought to believe was correct for what licenses i needed to buy. When i went down to my local office to buy the licensing the people at the front desk had no idea on what i needed to buy so i told them what i needed based on the phone conversation i had. They issued me the licensing and told me i was good to go. I started fishing and believed i was on the correct path because fish and game told me directly i have everything i need. In June of 2013 i was questioned by a Warden at the docks. She said that i do not have the correct licensing and paperwork. She gave me her number to call her if i have any questions. Because i didnt have the correct licensing, i stopped fishing all together. Three months after i stopped fishing because i knew i was told the wrong information, i recieved in the mail,11 citations from fish and game because i had the wrong licensing.
I dont understand how fish and game can do this to someone. I was told exactly what to buy from fish and wildlife HQ. So i bought what they told me to buy. And now i have to sell my boat and businees to defend myself for the wrong information they gave me. I called fish and wildlife everytime i saw somthing fishy or if my divers saw something out of place to help them find the bad guys. I helped them, and now i sit here with 11 citations from them because they gave me the wrong information.
Adam c James"
1) F&G regulations are confusing.
2) If what he's saying is true, it looks like he just did some dumb stuff or was playing it fast and loose with the rules re commercial take of game.
2a) You shouldn't be messing around with laws that effect your livelihood if you don't understand those laws
3) I suspect in re (2) that he didn't just do some dumb stuff, because of the purported attempts to sell fish to restaurants without a receiver's license, which were not addressed in his open letter to DFW. And also there's been some scuttlebutt running around re him.
4) Like I said, I hope that Fish and Game is wrong about this, and I wish him the best of luck defending himself. But I suspect there's a pretty good chance that he was actually violating some laws.