How about wearing a lighter tank and the SAME belt?Doc Intrepid:Take it easy, Charlie, I wasn't trying to tie a knot in your tail.
My numbers aren't bogus, but they come from a different source:
http://www.lloydbaileysscuba.com/PST E Series Tanks.htm
And I'm aware that you recommended a steel tank, albeit a lighter steel tank, rather than an aluminum 80.
My point was that wearing any given diver, wearing given exposure protection, and all else being equal, will require W amount of weight to safely achieve equilibrium in the water.
X amount of that will be in the tank, and Y amount of that will be on the belt. Either way you want to go, you'll still need W amount total in the water.
That being the case, I'd rather be wearing a heavier tank (which by the way is also heavier because it holds 30 cu ft of gas more) and a lighter belt, than a lighter tank and a heavier belt. That same argument holds regardless of whether the lighter tank is made of steel or aluminum.
My basic point is that (given only one tank to select) I'd choose to optimize my rig for how it performs in the water rather than how heavy it is on the shore. As long as the heavier tank takes weight off my belt and gives me more gas in reserve, I'm happy with that trade-off. As always, YMMV.
You can do that with the E7-100 vs the E8-130. Your original post implied that the 130 allowed you to wear less on the belt than the 100, which it does not.
Was just a misunderstanding, but I think it's clear now