Question Is there a high pressure version of LP50's?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

The 90's ScubaPro/Faber Chrome Molly tanks (painted white) have a service pressure of 3000, and to my knowledge never had a "+".
 
The 90's ScubaPro/Faber Chrome Molly tanks (painted white) have a service pressure of 3000, and to my knowledge never had a "+".
Well, the one I purchased for my then-GF, the ones in my Scubapro catalogs, are listed as being "3,000 psig + 10%." They are galvanized, but unpainted in my 1987, 1988, and 1989 catalogs, and galvanized and painted white in my 1991 catalog. (Evidently, I misplaced my 1990 catalog.)

rx7diver
 
Well, the one I purchased for my then-GF, the ones in my Scubapro catalogs, are listed as being "3,000 psig + 10%." They are galvanized, but unpainted in my 1987, 1988, and 1989 catalogs, and galvanized and painted white in my 1991 catalog. (Evidently, I misplaced my 1990 catalog.)

rx7diver
That explains why these 1987 tanks are galvanized, though I think they've also been regalvanized

They were rated to 3,000 and have the + with the original manufacture date. Looks like they've gotten several hydros over the years. In 2021 they got a + stamp again. But the latest hydro in 2024 doesn't have the + stamp.

Am I correct in assuming that I need the + stamp after the most recent hydro test in order to get a + 10% fill to 3,300 psi?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20250910_115707026_AE.jpg
    IMG_20250910_115707026_AE.jpg
    111.6 KB · Views: 5
  • IMG_20250910_115739422_AE.jpg
    IMG_20250910_115739422_AE.jpg
    74.4 KB · Views: 5
That explains why these 1987 tanks are galvanized, though I think they've also been regalvanized

They were rated to 3,000 and have the + with the original manufacture date. Looks like they've gotten several hydros over the years. In 2021 they got a + stamp again. But the latest hydro in 2024 doesn't have the + stamp.

Am I correct in assuming that I need the + stamp after the most recent hydro test in order to get a + 10% fill to 3,300 psi?
Another theory that I read online is that the original manufacturer's + engraving covers the tank for +10% for all time as long as it keeps passing hydro.
 
... Am I correct in assuming that I need the + stamp after the most recent hydro test in order to get a + 10% fill to 3,300 psi?
Yes, that's my understanding. I had my old-school PST 72 (2,250 psig + 10%, originally stamped with a "plus") re-hydro'd in 2022. I had specifically asked to have it "plus"-stamped this time, like every other time. When it first came back, there was no "plus". So, my LDS sent it back for the "plus".

rx7diver
 

Back
Top Bottom