A couple of you have said something that made me raise a point of discussion.
You have said that "..my computer is more lenient" and "...allows me more NDL time than the other computer".
My discussion point is that, wouldn't you rather "err" on the side of safety by going with the more conservative computer? (which may result in less NDL time)
I realize that each computer is a bit different, and the algorithims being used are not perfect, and can't take into account other important data points (your physical size, level of athleticism, and other points that contribute to nitrogen loading and off gassing). But it seems "smarter" to me to go with something that provides me a slightly bit less exposure to the contributing factors of DCI/DCS than to push the limit.
Any comments/discussion?
(I'm not picking nits on brands, just introducing a general discussion point)