re-armed with the help of Charlie's link, I stumble deeper into the devisive whirlpool that is the stuporferry (flush twice for big'n's)!
The Garden Island news Hiraga viewpoint article, dated Oct. 12, '06 (
Superferry has run the gantlet), brought about an immediate reply viewpoint, dated Oct. 15 '06 (
Superferry has not run the gantlet), which is one of the earliest mainstream news sources mentioning DU that I've seen.
With regard to Hiraga's last couple years as DOT head, in a Pacific Buisness News article titled
DOT director says Lingle fired him (dated Dec. 21 '06), Hiraga refuted a Lingle announcement that he "wants to pursue other things."
He said he was "disappointed" by her decision. "I never really got a true reason but she doesn't need a reason," Haraga told KITV. The article hinted at the huge traffic delays after an overpass was damaged.
An interesting time-line conversation could be had with regard to testimony in a Pacific Wings suit against the State. A couple Maui News stories have very interesting HSF related information.
Gov. Lingle silent on Haraga ice-out (Feb. 6, '07) quotes Hiraga's deposition (Dec. '06) as including these statements:
In August 2005, his three deputies (for airports, harbors and highways) were told to report directly to Bob Awana, Lingle’s chief of staff, “The deputies do not report to me.”
He continued to sign contracts during his last year and a half but had no other operational functions. He could not, he said, get information about his divisions’ activities from his deputies.
The follow-up story,
Lingle sidelined transportation director but kept him on the payroll (Feb 10, '07), Transportation Chair Souki's Dec. testimony is quoted:
“I was aware last year that (Haraga’s) responsibilities were taken away from him. I didn’t know why.” Souki said he knew that “the power was going to (Haraga’s) respective deputies, he was left only with public relations.”
So Rod Hiraga could not get info from his deputies after Aug '05 and Joe Souki felt he only handled PR. A strong case might be made that
Hiraga was told to release that statement, since he was not part of the decisions. Also, if you look at the Hiraga statement, he claims no state taxpayer funds are being used, which does kind of sound like he was not informed by his deputy.