Thanks! This is what I figured. But I’ll still work on getting the cert. calling the dive shop tomorrow. But at this point I’ll also see if they will analyze them. Not going to buy an analyzer though. Not unless I’m diving Nitrox more often. Right now I dive in my neighborhood. Again it’s fresh water. And at peek it’s 40+ feet in spots. Right now it’s about 30+ feet. I don’t get the chance to do deep dives often.
Sorry I asked. I was hesitant because as I said. I know the right answer is to be certified. But I wanted opinions on this one. I didn’t mean to get some of you worked up.
Apologize for nothing! I think you scored some good tanks, asked good questions, got usable answers, and you're on the right path. Much better to ask these kinds of questions than to wing it. I bet you can think of somebody who would have just thought "eh, what could go wrong," and gone ahead and dived them -- I know I can think of a few.
That risk factor exists on every tank you didn't personally observe being filled, even allegedly "air" tanks. Nobody tells air divers to analyze their tanks.
Eh, I disagree. The risk of a tank labeled 32% but which actually contains 100% is not zero if the tank was filled by partial pressure blending, which is pretty common on a lot of areas. Not so much for one labelled air-only, or at a shop that only does air fills, or at a shop that uses a different method of blending. But, the OP does not really have access to the information needed reason this all out. Sounds like that problem will be solved soon though, according to post #22.
If your point is that all divers should be taught to analyze their tanks, well, we are in agreement. Making this a separate course from OW is a little silly, but for one reason or another, that is the industry standard. If I were king of the world, nitrox would be included in OW instruction -- but I'm not an instructor, or a course director, or a nitrox salesman, or even king of the world for that matter, so what do I know