Hmmm. Haven't been on SB long have you?Now, can we please table this silly debate, and get back to discussing regulators.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Hmmm. Haven't been on SB long have you?Now, can we please table this silly debate, and get back to discussing regulators.
Now, can we please table this silly debate, and get back to discussing regulators.
Are you really sure PADI designated "under right arm" for the Octo? You never heard the "triangle"? Octo below the chin is right at the apex of the "triangle"!Can't agreed more.
In PADI, we were taught with the Octo under our right arm and sharing our Octo.
Long hose set up from what I've seen so far are mostly for tech divers which have a different set of drill as their training that we PADI divers may not be familiar with.
That is the point. But more particularly to the rescue of an unconscious diver and the need to remove gear whilst in the water.Ah ok, sorry, I think I get your meaning, are you're saying that due to lack of knowledge/experience he may put himself at risk? Not explaining set up with buddy/DM before dive etc?
Please explain how diving with a long hose and BP/W is problematic for a rescue.
It is easy to understand the set-up, and with some practice and a process not that difficult to remove. But in refresh sessions I have seen gear removed and the hose still around neck and the BPW go to the bottom. One could say there should be more air in the wing, but when trying to remove a harness without quick release if the wing is inflated this tightens the harness. Hence for buoyancy the dry-suit is used. This is in pool sessions, try this in rough open water with a genuine emergency. I haven't seen anyone who can in a timely fashion remove a BPW without some practice and preferably a process, start at the head and move down coming out from the middle and clearing all items.Tbar, how can a long hose with heavy back plate be problematic? Don't mean to be a dick but I'm just not seeing it, it's two hoses, weight on your back and a harness without quick disconnects. If a buddy or DM can't understand the set up after a 1 minute conversation then I'm not sure I want to buddy with them. It's just not that hard.
I said "I do not know many dive masters who have actually trained at rescuing differing configs." Not being trained and experienced increases the inherent risk, we train to help manage down the risk.Their divemasters must be really stupid and incompetent since they can't figure out how to handle longer hoses and BPW rigs. BUT, they are PADI trained so that is understandable.
I am not sure how what infers I am not supportive of new technology! If a diver is using some this that others are not aware of then there is a change in risk and the buddy pair and diver master/leader need to have a common understanding risks and responses.If we just go with what PADI teaches, the diving world will be a very small limited world. You are also implying that if new technology or a better way to do things comes along, one can't use it until "PADI" approves it. If so, we wouldn't be using NITROX today for example.
I just came here for some different opinions on regulator setups, not to start a flame war.
Assuming that a 40" hose on a primary will automatically kill me or my buddy is closed minded. I'm more than happy to educate my buddy and/or DM about which hose is my primary and which is for backup. If they don't understand that in about 60 seconds, then they're not someone I want to dive with.
Now, can we please table this silly debate, and get back to discussing regulators.
I can't see how a 40" hose on a primary will automatically kill you, and I didn't say it would! My comments also are not directed at OOA but rescue. Have you done your rescue course yet?The overall advice in this forum tends to revolve around BRAND or regulator or hose length. Neither of which is a serious life-safety decision.
Even a fully inflated wing would have no impact on the harness!One could say there should be more air in the wing, but when trying to remove a harness without quick release if the wing is inflated this tightens the harness.
Apeks.Now, can we get back to discussing regulators.
I mean the octo hose.Are you really sure PADI designated "under right arm" for the Octo? You never heard the "triangle"? Octo below the chin is right at the apex of the "triangle"!
PADI is NOT the only training agency in the world. Have you ever dived with other divers from different agency?
I can donate my primary 2nd stage(long hose) to anyone within couple of seconds. How long would it take you to donate your Octo to a diver in distress?
I am also PADI trained but moved on! The octo should be within the "triangle" if I remember correctly.I mean the octo hose.
And i know there is alot more institution than just PADI. But i al.not sure if u've read that the OP stated he was PADI trained too...
One of the biggest mistakes I see in rescue classes are divers in all the same gear. The last class I taught we had single tank jackets, single tank bpw's, divers in dry suits and wetsuits, and in sidemount. Getting a diver out of a bpw and long hose is actually faster and easier. You just cut the harness. A trilobite will zip through it like a hot knife through butter. I set up my harness to be cut off by the students. A rescue diver or any dive pro should not have a problem with any open circuit configuration. If they do that's a problem.