The anecdotal experiences from myself and a lot of friends are that the bubble models work within the parameters of REALLY SHORT bottom times, but that once you start going beyond a certain threshold they stop working...
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
as a counterpoint, i've done vpm dives on pretty big exposures with no issues.The anecdotal experiences from myself and a lot of friends are that the bubble models work within the parameters of REALLY SHORT bottom times, but that once you start going beyond a certain threshold they stop working...
Your day will come.as a counterpoint, i've done vpm dives on pretty big exposures with no issues.
but i'm unbendable
nah. i've been doing fork putdowns and i'm DIR af. can't be bentYour day will come.
You anecdotal experience would align well with how VPM actually operates. See the discussion here and the links referenced.The anecdotal experiences from myself and a lot of friends are that the bubble models work within the parameters of REALLY SHORT bottom times, but that once you start going beyond a certain threshold they stop working...
June 2013 on the wrecks at Bikini Atoll, it was after the fourth consecutive day of two deco dives with 20/20 Trimix and Air top-off on the prescribed deeper stops of the Ratio Deco method, when I started having a few latent indistinct musculoskeletal transitory aches & pains ("the niggles") in my limbs/joints. So again, as implied by the NEDU Study, there's that long time duration exposure of Slow Tissue Supersaturation -over consecutive days in my case- which finally resulted in the start of microbubble formation and/or an inflammatory response by day four. Also note that the bottom gases of 20/20 Trimix, and Air top-off on the repetitive dive had very high FN2, with bottom depths ranging from 24m to 63m and bottom times of 35 to 50 minutes on Open Circuit. Deco gases were Nitrox50 and Oxygen.The anecdotal experiences from myself and a lot of friends are that the bubble models work within the parameters of REALLY SHORT bottom times, but that once you start going beyond a certain threshold they stop working...
June 2013 on the wrecks at Bikini Atoll, it was after the fourth consecutive day of two deco dives with 20/20 Trimix and Air top-off on the prescribed deeper stops of the Ratio Deco method, when I started having a few latent indistinct musculoskeletal transitory aches & pains ("the niggles") in my limbs/joints. So again, as implied by the NEDU Study, there's that long time duration exposure of Slow Tissue Supersaturation -over consecutive days in my case- which finally resulted in the start of microbubble formation and/or an inflammatory response by day four. Also note that the bottom gases of 20/20 Trimix, and Air top-off on the repetitive dive had very high FN2, with bottom depths ranging from 24m to 63m and bottom times of 35 to 50 minutes on Open Circuit. Deco gases were Nitrox50 and Oxygen.
By end of consecutive dive day number eight and immediately upon surfacing, I developed acute classic pain only type 1 DCS Right Shoulder, resolved with elective IWR and with the liveaboard's (M/V Windward) multiplace Recompression Chamber standing by. My treating hyperbaric physician on that Bikini Expedition was none other than Simon Mitchell, so while Dr. Mitchell started my IV Drip [Plasmalyte w/ Caldolor (Ibuprofen)] after completing the long IWR profile, I got the big picture, real world "captive patient" reminder again on his presentation of the applied results of NEDU Study.
Uh Ross,Kevin, I need to point out..... You did Ratio Deco methods..... You did not use VPM-B, and you did not employ bubble model theory. You did not strictly follow the basic gas kinetics formula. There is no connection between this incident and the nedu test.
You followed your advanced DIR classroom theories, where it has been a practice to override basic formula, to invent new reasons to diverge from the baseline, and to add different stops in different places. You used this over a multi-day heavy diving schedule.
That's what got you in trouble... Not bubble models, not VPM-B.
And that's the practical dilemma for the traveling tech diver on multi-day/multi-week overseas expedition trips --an individual trial & error experience on how much extra deco stress your tissues can take versus O2/CNS exposure limits with extended Oxygen profile times to clean up those tissues as needed --or worse-- with Oxygen in an IWR contingency because of acute DCS.______
I fully agree with your remarks that there is a need for extra caution over multi-day big diving. There is a residual lingering stress effect, and a multi-day depletion of energy and fluids, that cannot be modeled or accounted for in math. Like all physical activity, there are limits on endurance, stamina and the need for rest and recuperation.
This multi-day condition is one of many where smart dive planning procedure and practices and training, is needed to modify the dive plan.
Uh Ross,
No disrespect . . .but Simon Mitchell was my treating Physician for my type 1 DCS injury in Bikini Atoll June 2013, and witnessed all my dives up to Day Eight when the injury occurred --not you Ross.
I understand now and fully accept his diagnosis and the implied pathogenic etiology of Slow Tissue Supersaturation that he described with regard to the NEDU Deep Stops Study in a lecture presentation given during the trip. (My only profound regret over the whole incident was for both causing unnecessary worry for Dr. Mitchell by electing to choose IWR against medical advice of using the shipboard Recompression Chamber instead, as well as not telling him earlier about the "niggles" starting on Day Four).
The use of high FN2 bottom gases like 20/20 Trimix and Deep Air on Open Circuit, multiple mandatory deco dives per day over several consecutive days of a week or more; and doing two or more such "Expedition Trips" per year for the past six years: that's what really got me in trouble. I think my body's inflammatory response has reached its "deco stress tolerance", an inevitability that would have happened anyway in my experience & in my opinion whether using Ratio Deco or VPM-B or even Buhlmann ZHL-16 GF's implementation over such a career, along with just plain aging & physically getting out of fitness.
Doesn't necessarily mean this will happen to everyone over time, but then again it's something to be aware of if a pattern of post-dive "DCS symptomatology" -either vague or acute- arises from a previously routine deco profile with formerly benign post-dive results.
And that's the practical dilemma for the traveling tech diver on multi-day/multi-week overseas expedition trips --an individual trial & error experience on how much extra deco stress your tissues can take versus O2/CNS exposure limits with extended Oxygen profile times to clean up those tissues as needed --or worse-- with Oxygen in an IWR contingency because of acute DCS.
Those are real ethical & vital issues Ross -perhaps you and Simon can at least find common ground on that and discuss it here.