Navy sinks plans to bring supercarrier to Maryland

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

pir8

Contributor
Scuba Instructor
Messages
2,659
Reaction score
7
Location
Philadelphia
# of dives
I'm a Fish!
Navy sinks plans to bring supercarrier to Maryland
The Associated Press
Dec 7, 2006 3:59 PM (5 hrs ago)

BALTIMORE - A group of veterans who served on the nation's first
supercarrier say their decade-long effort to bring the great ship to
Baltimore as a floating museum has failed. The veterans told The Baltimore
Examiner the Navy likely will sink the USS Forrestal for use as an
artificial reef.
"We're up against a brick wall we can't beat," said Jack Lawler, a board
member of the nonprofit USS Forrestal Museum Inc. "I guess they found it
was better to sink Forrestal than to save 50 years of history."

Launched in December 1954, the Forrestal served in the Atlantic and the
Mediterranean as well as off of Vietnam. It was the first carrier built to
accommodate modern aircraft and became the model for the carriers currently
in service.
During her service in Vietnam, an onboard fire took the lives of 140
sailors. Among the survivors of that fire was Lt. Comdr. John McCain, who
would become a U.S. Sen. from Arizona and presidential candidate.

The ship was decommissioned in 1993 and the nonprofit group was created
consisting of former officers and crew members and other supporters.
Touting Maryland's rich maritime history, the group had proposed anchoring
the Forrestal at sites such as Locust Point, Port Covington, near the Bay
Bridge, Fort McHenry and, most recently, Baltimore County's Sparrows Point
peninsula, which won the support of activists lobbying against a planned
liquid natural gas plant there.

The Navy donates ships to cities, states and nonprofit groups who submit
applications and funding plans, but a Naval official told The Baltimore
Examiner in October that the Forrestal was removed from the official
donation-approved list because of apparent lack of interest.
"Given that the ship had been decommissioned since 1993 and that the Navy
can't continue to retain the ship indefinitely in Newport, Rhode Island, we
cannot support putting the ship back on donation hold," said Katie
Dunnigan, a spokeswoman for the Naval Sea Systems Command.

Officials told The Examiner there were technical problems with some of the
applications submitted.

Information from: The Baltimore Examiner, http://www.examiner.com
Copyright 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
 
This should be no surprise to the folks who wanted it as a museum. There aren't any "supercarriers" on display as museums.

Why? because they can't keep the ship as decomissioned in a controled area as required for security reasons. Why is that required? Because the design features of the ships hull are still classified. If they left it in Baltimore's harbor, it could be somewhat eaisly recon'd since it's no longer in a controlled secure area.

BTW... when they sink this as a reef, they will sink it deep and out of the public eye. I'm sure the exact location will not be public information. This also means it'll be way to deep to dive.
 
THIS ARTICLE HAS SOME INFO. ITS DESIGN HAS LEAD TO MODERN AIRCRART CARRIER SPECS SO IT WILL BE SUNK WELL OUT OF REC/TEC LIMITS en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Forrestal
 

Back
Top Bottom