US Navy Experimental Diving Unit

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

A tip of the MK 5 or KMBs off to @Akimbo for this very informative post

I had several up close and personal contacts with EDU --

I was in the process of acquiring all the USN diving manuals and was in contact on numerous occasions with the NEU librarian, whose name as I recall after all these many years was Mrs. Mc Donald

She was one salty librarian - like no other I have ever met --buit she was also extremely helpful and I managed to acquire all of the USN manuals prior to diving bibliophilia became rampant in the diving world.

(an of course the 1923 edition was stolen by La crook- Why ???)

SDM
 
She was one salty librarian - like no other I have ever met...

Was this before the move to Panama City? I don't know much about the culture at NEDU today, but it was really salty when it was at the Washington Navy Yard. Salvage was the major focus of the Navy diving community at that time, which is easily one of the harshest diving environments.

The Navy Yard didn't look anything like it does now on the NCIS TV series.
 
Continued from previous post

EDU was called on in 1939 to aid in the rescue of the crew and to later salvage the USS Squalus. She sank during a test dive on 12 May 1939 when the main air induction valve failed to close. She sank to the bottom off Portsmouth, New Hampshire in 243'/74M of water. They rescued 33 survivors of the 59 man crew. Unfortunately the rest of the crew perished soon after the sinking in flooded compartments. I remember watching this on TV with my family in the 1950s.


Four divers were awarded the Medal of Honor for their work during the rescue and salvage. The Squalus was extensively overhauled and recommissioned as the USS Sailfish in February of 1940. She performed 12 patrols in the Pacific during World War II. I recommend The Terrible Hours: The Greatest Submarine Rescue in History by Peter Maas for anyone interested in learning more.


World War II
The prospect of war increased EDU's focus on support for combat swimmers. The units that would become the UDT or Underwater Demolition Team had not been formed yet. Christian Lambertsen designed a series of pure Oxygen rebreathers starting in 1940 as a medical student. He named them Laru for Lambertsen Amphibious Respiratory Unit which became a standard for UDT and SEALs for decades.

Lambertson coined the acronym
SCUBA in 1952* to describe all
Self-Contained Underwater
Breathing Apparatus

* some accounts indicate that Lambertson used the term in the 1940s... either way, he is universally credited.


Breathing apparatus wasn't EDU's only concern. Oxygen tolerance and thermal protection were also problems that limited combat swimmers' ability to operate. Oxygen Toxicity was generally defined in medical literature but figuring out operational limits needed a lot of work.

Dramatic improvements in aircraft technology was causing aviators to suffer closely related symptoms to divers including low PPO2 (Partial Pressures of Oxygen), barotrauma, and DCS. Aviation pioneers didn’t always connect the dots just like the divers 30 years before. Solving these problems naturally fell on EDU. Other unusual tasks like developing an improved life jacket were assigned to EDU because of their expertise in submersion physiology.

Post-War EDU
The end of the war allowed EDU to return their primary focus to submarine rescue and diving R&D, although support for the UDT (later SEALs) and high-altitude physiology was included. Some of the notable projects included:
  • Time-depth oxygen limits
  • Improved air decompression tables
  • Repetitive air decompression tables
  • Multigas decompression theory
  • Decompression treatment tables that are still the standard of care
  • Diver thermal tolerance and protection
Hugh Bradner was a physicist at UC Berkeley when he invented the wetsuit in 1952. EDU quickly began testing the new suit to understand the limits for the UDT and the evolving EOD (Explosive Ordnance Disposal) divers. Navy salvage divers weren't very interested in any form of SCUBA or the wetsuit largely because their work required communications, long bottom times, heavy-lifting support, power for cutting tools, and was usually in a relatively small area. The Mark V dominated Navy diving and was augmented by the surface-supplied Jack Browne mask.

EDU was also a minor sponsor of Hannes Keller and Dr. Albert Bühlmann's revolutionary work. Keller's dive to 1,010'/308M in 1962 smashed all human depth records. Unfortunately Keller barely survived while his dive-mate Peter Small and safety diver Chris Whittaker died.

Project Genesis
Captain George Bond started a series of "off-the-clock" experiments based on Dr. Behnke's proposition in 1942 that divers could be exposed to greater depths until tissue become fully saturated and eliminate further increases in decompression. Captain Bond began animal studies at the Naval Medical Research Laboratory in 1957, aided by Walter F. Mazzone. The success of animal studies led to human testing at EDU in 1962. There is a fascinating back-story of politics, dedication, and diving history described in the books Papa Topside and SeaLab by SEALAB Author Ben H.. Highly recommended.

Diving pioneers including Jacques Cousteau and Edwin Link quickly began open-sea saturation experiments with underwater habitats. The US Navy also began their open-sea experiments with the Sealab habitats. Habitat-based saturation systems were soon replaced by surface-based chambers with diving bells (PTC or Personnel Transfer Capsule in Navy parlance) outside of shallow and limited scientific projects.


The Cold War
Nuclear powered submarines and ballistic missiles convinced Navy's decision makers to reevaluate their priorities. That rapidly pushed submarine development to #1. That and loss of the submarine USS Thresher in 1963 at a depth of 8,400'/2,600M changed everything.


Government and industrial R&D funding for deep diving, manned and robot vehicles, and ocean science exploded. The fledgling offshore oil industry was also moving into deep water off California and augmented the demand. A lot of industries believed that government sponsored undersea R&D would soon rival NASA in funding.

Naval Support Activity Panama City
There were a lot of moving parts in those days, and many of involved security clearances at the highest levels and secret budgets in the billions. Some of this came to light when the book Blind Man's Bluff The Untold Story of American Submarine Espionage was published.

EDU and the diving school had long outgrown facilities in Washington DC. NEDU (now the preferred moniker) moved to Panama City, Florida in 1975 and the school followed several years later. NEDU's new facility included the massive Ocean Simulation Facility (OSF) with an operating depth of 2,250'/690M. Five interconnected living and transfer chambers on the second deck attached to the 7,352 Ft³/210M³ horizontal wet chamber on the deck below. The entire end of the wet chamber opens for access so small submersible vehicles can be tested.

View attachment 413465

This image is courtesy of Stephen Frink from the excellent article Deep in the Science of Diving
by Michael Menduno that was published in Alert Diver Magazine. It gives you a sense of the wetpot's massive scale.

View attachment 414411
NEDU’s Executive Officer LCDR Steve Duba stands in the open wet pot of the Ocean Simulation Facility.

OSF's chamber temperatures can be controlled between 28-104° F/-2-40° C. Living chambers can also simulation altitudes up to 150,000'/46Km. It is still the largest hypobaric and hyperbaric research facility in the world.


The new NEDU logo reflects their R&D work for SEALs in addition to Navy divers.

View attachment 413466

I will let other Scubaboard members continue the saga because I don't have direct experience at the Panama City facility. I look forward to reading their experiences and the sea stories.

Scubaboard Footnotes

Oxygen Toxicity

Rubicon Research Repository

Deadly helmet squeeze

What do you call this gear?

Edit: Added Stephen Frink's photo and updated text.
Fabulous reading; thank you for the effort to make it available to the rest of us.
 
Simply fabulous.

Thank you for making my day. It was so enjoyable to watch.
 
Last edited:
Here is another video that is also very nice. Hope you all enjoy it.

From the publisher:"A short documentary covering the remarkable work being conducted at the Navy's Experimental Dive Unit, located in Panama City Beach, Florida. As the name suggests, their work is experimental but is backed by a team of very brave, creative, and dedicated scientists, Navy Divers, E.O.D Techs, and Special Warfare Operators. Their work continues to pave the way towards pushing the envelope, while mitigating risks, increasing the capabilities of today's U.S Military Undersea professionals."

 
I agree, a great read.

I just wanted to add that W. G. Fischer's NEDU report of 1 March 1957 entitled "Comparative evaluation of swim fins" can be downloaded from http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/780665.pdf. This is what I wrote about this publication on SB back in 2013:

"I have a print copy of Fischer's report, which I ordered and obtained twenty years ago from the Navy Experimental Diving Unit library. I'm a big fan of this publication, not least because it's written in plain English without skimping on the quantitative data, while many researchers seem to write just with their PhD supervisors in mind rather than explain their findings to an intelligent lay audience. The report is also worth a read because it was the first to define the criteria by which swim fins could be compared, not only for performance but also for fit. It also set standards for measuring fin dimensions, weight and stiffness and complained about manufacturers' vagueness when it came to stipulating the materials used to construct the fins, even at a time when most fins were made of the same material; See 2.3: 'Terms used by manufacturers to describe materials used include: 1. pure rubber gum 2. gum rubber 3. live rubber 4. synthetic rubber 5. hard rubber 6. moulded rubber. The actual significance of these terms is ill-defined'.

Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose... Modern fin manufacturers still seldom provide information about the exact internal dimensions of foot pockets so that people can order correctly-sized fins online, and they can be still just as uniformative when it comes to the fin material; I've seen the term 'space-age materials' used to describe some indeterminate plastic used in fin construction, which certainly leaves me little the wiser."
 
I just wanted to add that W. G. Fischer's NEDU report of 1 March 1957...

This brings two things to mind. Do you have links to any newer reports? To the best of my knowledge, NEDU made the first hyperbaric breathing machine to test regulators. I always wondered why they didn't make one for fins. It wouldn't be that hard today with the precision CT machines that can create 3D computer models and 3D printers to replicated bones and joints.

That technology is used by ConforMIS for several different joint replacements. A good friend, who happens to be receiving a NOGI award this year, just had his knee replaced using this system. Very cool technology.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom