My 'Pretty Fin' Patent

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

This foil contains an internal frame structure, represented by image Fig 60 shown from the edge and Fig 61 showing one face. It is made of a firm but bendable silicone or plastic. In the structure, a void exists in section Fig 61-H and Fig 61-J to accommodate intertwining the loop cable harnesses. The topography of sections H and J are shown in images Fig 67 and 68. The block attached to the loops inserts in the voids at Fig 68. The loops are inserted and crossed at Fig 68-H, then attached at Fig 61-X, Y, Z (also see Fig 66-K). The actual distance between sections can be adjusted to match the intended use of the fin.
zDiscr60.png

For example; a longer fin could be used for distance cruising, and a shorter for sprint swimming.

To make this foil, first the frame (Fig 61) is cast. Then the axle shafts are inserted into the tunnels located at Fig 63-G (two places). Next three cable sets are installed by weaving into the frame (Fig 63) and inserting the blocks (Fig 63-J).
zDiscr61.png

zDiscr62.png

Once woven into the structure the three cable assemblies Fig 62 will be anchored between the voids at Fig 61-J and the turnstile features at Fig 61-X, Y, Z. The X-Y-Z features are of two different sizes, two larger and one smaller on one side, and opposed by two smaller, and one larger on the opposite. This accommodates the variation in size of cable loops in each cable pair.

The profile shown Fig 63 represents the frame with the cable assemblies woven in
zDiscr63.png

To weave a cable pair, first one of the cable loops are selected. On the side facing you, if there is a larger turnstile, choose the longer loop. Insert the exposed end into a void at Fig 61-J, then pull though and press the epoxy block in filling the void. Lay the cable loops forward, then insert the larger loop through the void at Fig61-H, pull through and forward then snap the cable end over the turnstile (Fig 61-X, Fig 66-K) to secure it. Then the shorter loop is inserted into the void at H from the other side, and inside and through the larger loop. Pulled through then forward secured to the turnstile similar to the first loop, but on the opposite side in all sections.

The same weaving process is applied to the other two cable pair assemblies. Then the tubes on the cables are slid down until butted up against the epoxy blocks.

Then the entire foil assembly is placed into a mold and a highly elastic silicone injected filling up all voids, and encasing the whole assembly. Because the cables are lubricated and inside the tubing, they will continue to be able to slide freely.
 
In operation during a kick-stroke of the cable-fin, a foil experiences more pressure on one face. Supported at two points, the blade bends into a foil shape. This pulls on the cables on the convex side, and loosens on the concave side. These changes in length are transferred to the opposite sides and forward through the voids at H. This has control over the section at front since it has less surface area than the middle does. Tension on the cables pulls to bend the leading edge into the correct foil shape, as it is shown in the image Fig 65.

The final form of the foil can be either like Fig 46 or Fig 47 depending on inclusion of the side fences in the mold cavity.


zDiscr64.png
zDiscr65.png
zDiscr66.png
zDiscr67.png
 
That concludes the discussion part of the patent.
So, any questions?
 
Seems overly complex
What is the benefit of this style? More power or less effort for example
Is there a prototype?
Will it hold up to salt and sand in the pivot points?
How much do you think it will cost to make and how much to the consumer?
 
I just have a layman's understanding of the field, but I think you are underestimating the importance of the relatively unconstrained trailing edge of a conventional fin. Propulsion ultimately comes from the net of all the force vectors of water displaced through a kick cycle. The fastest displacement in the most advantageous vector (i.e. directly behind you) is generated by the whipping action of thin sections at the end of the fin, either the whole fin surface or thin stretchy channels

That's why freediving fins (and fast moving fish) look the way they do. But all fins after the original duck feet are designed to take advantage of this to a greater or lesser extent.


It looks to me like you will be giving up more by limiting the free movement of the end of the fin than you will gain by improving the shape of the blade. Especially with all the necessary superstructure which has to dragged through the water while contributing little if any forward thrust.

Another point is that humans are much stronger kicking forward (on the downstroke when in a horizontal diving position) than backward. There may be little point in designing a fin that works equally well in both directions if it compromises the design for the more important downstroke.

If you are familiar with Force Fins, they are engineered to maximize both of these factors in a relatively short fin by having the entirety of the fin body bend and then whip back into shape on the downstroke. On the upstroke, the tips of the fins almost fold out of the way to make for an easier recovery.

Maybe @Bob Evans of Force Fins will stop by at some point. He's the foremost fin designer of the past half century and we are lucky to have him as a regular contributor on this forum.
 
Wow. All that for flappy leg finning.

Does it work for proper finning techniques? Frog kick, back kick, helicopter turns, etc?

Simplicity is key.
 
Wow. All that for flappy leg finning.

Does it work for proper finning techniques? Frog kick, back kick, helicopter turns, etc?

Simplicity is key.
There's also a big market for fins that are optimized for letting people easily flutter kick in a more or less straight line.
 
There's also a big market for fins that are optimized for letting people easily flutter kick in a more or less straight line.
As seen by all the fins in the average local dive shop with special magical features that will turn flappy leg kicking into flappy leg kicking.

Quick pause to have a titter about bicycle kicking.


Back kick proficiency should be required before travel divers are allowed to use a camera in a group. :)

Not to mention being allowed anywhere near fragile eco-systems.
 
https://www.shearwater.com/products/peregrine/

Back
Top Bottom