Yo Joey!
caveseeker7:
... I'm pretty sure ... I still consider... just my opinion ... I'd take
IMHO ! I know you're from New York, so let me make sure:
Around here that stands for In My Humble Opinion,
not I'm a ho!
padiscubapro:
I thnk Christina would debate that..
She might well disagree with it, but I'm not sure she would debate it (again). I said the 15.5 is the most desirable
for many, not for all, not the best.
While not her preference, I'm sure she's aware the 15.5
is the most desired unit by many people.
The HH for the mk 15.5 has alot more options than the SMI electronics, and the new POD is really nice..
It can be used with either an analog secondary, a digital secondary or the HH secondary...
Again, I said I consider, not that SMI'electronics are the best. Just my opinion again.
The HH has plenty of options, but some stuff I miss.
As Mike pointed out, you can only have a HUD without the analog needle gauge. I really want to have both.
The SMI electronics have a physical power switch that eliminates stray currents from the electronics feeding back to the sensors, which is a perfect combination for the cell-powered secondary.
The SMI electronics track and validate cell performance.
Yes, yes, yes, I know you don't belive that is possible. But if you have a look at the Evo's new manual on page 64, Section 7.9 titled Cell Validation, you'll see that even your Inspiration Buddy Martin has figured it out(though implemented differently - the Evo runs the solenoid on a single cell, the SM1600/Prism doesn't, it's run manually/monitored on one cell).
As I don't know how the MK version of the HH is wired into the MK series I don't know if the primary and secondary are completely independent. I prefer that, it ties in with the battery switch described above, and Mike's big black baby has it.
Personally, If I was looking for a MK 15 type I would hold off for Kevin Gurr's Ourbourous... It beats any MK 15 hands down..
Kevin ran me through it at DEMA, but briefly and on an assembled rig, so I don't remember it all that well.
In my
opinion it needs to have independent O2 monitoring and the rest of the items I described above.
Everything additional I don't need, but if well implemented would be appriciated. There better be something extra as the price Kevin mentioned last year was about 50% higher than Prism, BI et al.
What I do remeber is that it is one large piece of equipment. Makes your custom rig look like a Biaffra breather ... .
I was suprised to see all four cells inline, common wisdom seems not to do that. I wonder about the reasoning behind it.
I don't belive that what they mean when they say the sensors should be linear.
Actually, the 4th cell suprised me, too, IMHO an integrated computer should run off the three cells that maintain the setpoint.
What do you like about the Ouroboros? It doesn't even have a yellow cover?
Its going to go for about $8000 pounds ...
Is that 8000 US Dollar, 8000 British Pound, or 8000 lbs of dollars ?
