Info MIT Tech Review Article: Deep Diving on Hydrogen

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

tursiops

Marine Scientist and Master Instructor (retired)
ScubaBoard Supporter
Scuba Instructor
Messages
18,417
Reaction score
19,017
Location
U.S. East Coast
# of dives
2500 - 4999

NOTE: This is a preview article in front of a paywall. At best, you can access it once. I think.

If you can't see the original, here is a handmade pdf using PrintFriendly.
 

Attachments

  • technologyreview.com-Meet the divers trying to figure out how deep humans can go.pdf
    4.1 MB · Views: 119
Excellent. THANKS for posting! :cheers:
 
Skimmed over it out of curiosity as I'm not technical diver. The focus was achieving dive depths greater than helium. Hydrogen was noted to be highly flammable and pull heat out of your body fast (I'm not sure how much practical impact that has).

I'm posting because I have a question I didn't notice addressed. It's my understanding from past discussions on SB that helium is a limited resource, 'scarce' if you will, and we're using it up. It's also quite expensive for technical divers to purchase, IIRC.

So, I wonder if hydrogen will prove viable to replace helium at the depths and for the purposes helium is now used, and how the cost is apt to compare.

Also, does anyone know whether current rebreathers will be adaptable to its use, or a new model might be needed? I know very little about rebreathers; again, just curious.
 
@drrich2 : this will give you an idea of the problem : hydrogen + 5%O2 = big kaboom !

So it's easier to mix anything with helium, which neutral. Hydrogen is interesting only for very deep (and so very hypoxic dives) to prevent narcosis and high pressure nervous syndrome (sorry but you'll have to bear with me on that one, English is not my 1st language, so I'm not sure if I use the correct terminology in this instance or not. In French, we use the acronym SNHP).
 
Skimmed over it out of curiosity as I'm not technical diver. The focus was achieving dive depths greater than helium. Hydrogen was noted to be highly flammable and pull heat out of your body fast (I'm not sure how much practical impact that has).

I'm posting because I have a question I didn't notice addressed. It's my understanding from past discussions on SB that helium is a limited resource, 'scarce' if you will, and we're using it up. It's also quite expensive for technical divers to purchase, IIRC.

So, I wonder if hydrogen will prove viable to replace helium at the depths and for the purposes helium is now used, and how the cost is apt to compare.

Also, does anyone know whether current rebreathers will be adaptable to its use, or a new model might be needed? I know very little about rebreathers; again, just curious.
The idea was to replace N with H to alleviate HPNS and decrease the gas density of the mixture. H has a considerable narcotic effect, that's why it was used in the first place.

Let's hope for a quantum leap in nuclear fusion research. Then we'd get He as a product of H fusion.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20240301_153737_Samsung Notes.jpg
    Screenshot_20240301_153737_Samsung Notes.jpg
    65 KB · Views: 31
The idea was to replace N with H to alleviate HPNS and decrease the gas density of the mixture. H has a considerable narcotic effect, that's why it was used in the first place.
Minor quibble: Hydrogen has only a slight narcotic effect, in spite of a similar solubility as nitrogen. At the pressures involved, it was enough ameliorate HPNS but not enough to incapacitate.
 
It looks like hydrogen will remain an exotic choice used only by a small number of specialists – for extremely deep dives where work of breathing is an issue, and lower-density gas is a critical advantage. Plus the HPNS issue. Barring new developments, hydrogen is just too dangerous / hard to handle.

Also, the cost of helium is not as big an issue for divers using CCRs, because of the way, it’s recycled. OTOH, open-circuit helium is becoming problematic from a cost standpoint.
 
Amazing article. Just awesome.
 
Amazing article. Just awesome.
You may be interested in reading Ashley Stewart's article as well:
 
http://cavediveflorida.com/Rum_House.htm

Back
Top Bottom