DaleC
Contributor
I shoot video with an OC doublehose and the bubbles do scare the fish, just not as much. If I could afford it I would get a rec unit for shallow(<100') dives) for that reason and because I like to do extended trips where getting fills or packing multiple tanks can be an issue.
I just did a salmon run and met two guys on RB's. They got closer to the fish than I did. In this video you can see my closest on OC at 1:20... and how close I could get with no bubbles at 4:30...
[video=youtube;HXCM7w3-QZs]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HXCM7w3-QZs&list=UU5zvhnU0XYpf_cadpYJYkhQ[/video]
Another way to look at it would be to ask: If OC didn't exist, would you dive RB or not at all. Would the learning curve/risk be too great? People look down on it because they compare it to OC but I see it as a stand alone technology - if you started out on one you probably wouldn't even know it was suppose to be hard.
I learned to drive a manual transmission (with armstrong steering) before an automatic. It was just what I had. The clutch and shifting gears did add task loading, but not so much that I could not do it.
I just did a salmon run and met two guys on RB's. They got closer to the fish than I did. In this video you can see my closest on OC at 1:20... and how close I could get with no bubbles at 4:30...
[video=youtube;HXCM7w3-QZs]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HXCM7w3-QZs&list=UU5zvhnU0XYpf_cadpYJYkhQ[/video]
Another way to look at it would be to ask: If OC didn't exist, would you dive RB or not at all. Would the learning curve/risk be too great? People look down on it because they compare it to OC but I see it as a stand alone technology - if you started out on one you probably wouldn't even know it was suppose to be hard.
I learned to drive a manual transmission (with armstrong steering) before an automatic. It was just what I had. The clutch and shifting gears did add task loading, but not so much that I could not do it.
Last edited: