Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
A 35-year-old woman died on Saturday after finding herself in trouble while diving, the police said.
Christine Gauci was an Armed Forces of Malta member with a passion for scuba diving. She was underwater at Mġarr ix-Xini on Saturday morning.
The alarm was sounded by a diving companion when she failed to resurface following the dive.
Emergency services as well as Armed Forces officials were called to the site at around 10.30am and Ms Gauci was found and lifted to shore.
Paramedics administered first aid but she was pronounced dead at the scene, a police spokesperson said.
Magistrate Bridget Sultana will lead an inquiry into the case.
Throws a bad light on buddy diving, doesn't it?i dont see why he was convicted of involuntary homicide
makes me think twice about even diving with a novice never mind taking them on a dive that is remotely demandingThrows a bad light on buddy diving, doesn't it?
makes me think twice about even diving with a novice never mind taking them on a dive that is remotely demanding
When you read the details of the story, presuming true, it sounds like a series of disasters.Throws a bad light on buddy diving, doesn't it?
Were any contaminants found in the air? If yes, you have a case against the supplier, and if no, the supplier deserves ZERO blame.compressed air “supplied by an unlicensed operator with questionable maintenance on compressor,” were all factors in the fatal accident.
Nonsense, and irrelevant. It only speaks to what his body can tolerate.With regards to Gauci’s dive computer, he noted that “although the diving computer’s setting is not overtly dangerous in itself, its setting at its most aggressive setting speaks to the diver’s general demeanour towards risk taking.”
Is the buddy system the law there? Again, this is irrelevant and a misunderstanding. A buddy is a redundancy, a bonus. A buddy isn't intended to be a rescue diver who is baby-sitting the other diver. A dive-buddy isn't an acceptance of a legal or moral obligation. There is no written instruction book I am aware of which describes the entire responsibility of a dive-buddy that they must adhere to on EVERY second of every dive.The whole scope of the diving buddy system is for the two divers to be close to each other to assist each other in any untoward event during the dive.
Incorrect. Your first responsibility is always your own safety. A "lost" buddy may have simply swam off or got distracted; it is never a reason to jeopardize your safely just in case they may be on the surface, and may need assistance.In its sentence, court noted that the report specified that Castillo’s claim of being unable to follow Gauci as she ascended because he needed to decompress had been disproven by his decompression computer. “A two-minute deco obligation at five minutes is never an impediment to seek a lost diving buddy,” the report read.
I'd be curious what facts I'm missing. I responded to the procecutor-statements here, and I also commented on a 2nd article in this post. What the prosecutor is quoted as saying, are theoretically his most damning, important, and fundamental points.SlugMug is right but not looking at the correct facts to understand the legal decision.
Where is that quoted from? Most of what I've seen, was Castelo signaled to Gauci several times, to see if they needed to end the dive, and she suggested she was ok and to continue. I haven't seen where he supposedly pressured her into going.A local (and a military person to boot) dies while diving with a foreigner. She said she was tired but this foreigner “pressured” her into going.