Major Incident with Canaveral Cruise Ship

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

well, nothing was refurbished, just inspected and tested. If what was written in that report is true, then she is safe to sail and the crew needs a beating. The coast guard is pretty thorough. We had a dive boat delayed this season by the CG because th bilge was dirty.
 
deepstops:
First of all, they don't really use "rudders" anymore. Do you know what an azipod is??
A good friend works for ABB, the makers of the azipod systems used in nearly all new cruise ships and has described the "rudder tests" they perform during seatrials before the ships ever see their first passenger. In addition to that, my wife is a former employee of RCCL as an IT person that ran the inventory control system and was on one of the ships after a defective azipod was replaced in drydock in Curacao. After that level of work is performed, the USCG comes and recertifies the ship. IIRC, she said the limit of heeling was 42 degrees to pass the test and that ship "came close". She also described it as pretty unbelievable where the crew spent an entire day securing everything before the test. I am NOT saying it's likely a cruise ship will roll over but simply that their not as stable as you might have thought.

Yes, I've seen Azipods on TV. My point was that they could not cause a ship to list so quickly. How did they get the ship to list to 42 degrees when they tested it? What were the "rudder tests"?
 
truck1:
Heres the Latest.
http://www.wesh.com/news/9555476/detail.html
basically what it is saying is that there was and is no problem with the ship.It was human interference.

I would be surprised if a new ship with all of it's technological advancements that it would allow you to make such a severe turn. I am probably wrong but you would think it would have some type of system to prevent putting the ship into a turn that could lead to problems like they had or worse.
 
I bet the pucker factor was high...
 
https://www.shearwater.com/products/teric/
https://xf2.scubaboard.com/community/forums/cave-diving.45/

Back
Top Bottom