lamont
Contributor
If LV globally pushed out a new version of the software that wasn't fully QA'd and it introduced some other severe bug, then you'd be on here complaining about their crappy QA process and introducing a bug in the process of fixing another, and why can't they just produce a stable release, blah blah blah...
Better for them to get some halfway trusted beta testers that are going to e-mail them back with problems with the new code, rather than post new problems on the internet.
Is it really a surprise that people who are more valuable to doug as testers get the latest code sooner rather than people who make him have to deal with damage control?
Better for them to get some halfway trusted beta testers that are going to e-mail them back with problems with the new code, rather than post new problems on the internet.
Is it really a surprise that people who are more valuable to doug as testers get the latest code sooner rather than people who make him have to deal with damage control?